Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

ci: add release and docker workflows #3

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023
Merged

ci: add release and docker workflows #3

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

Baconing
Copy link
Member

@Baconing Baconing commented Dec 18, 2023

Make CI workflows to automatically create release on tagged push matching v*.

Push docker images on release and on push to master or develop branches.

Also a couple accidental files that were in the wrong branch.

Closes #2

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Implemented a new trigger for Docker builds upon release events.
    • Added multi-stage build process in Dockerfile for optimized production images.
    • Introduced a new "beeapi" service in the example Docker Compose configuration.
  • Enhancements

    • Streamlined configuration initialization and access across the application.
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows for more precise build and release processes.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed and updated functions in config and database packages for better clarity and usage.
    • Modified the router initialization to accommodate different application environments.
  • Documentation

    • Updated example service configuration to guide deployment using Docker Compose.
  • Chores

    • Removed unnecessary logging statement in the main application file.

add a Dockerfile and example compose file.
make a workflow that automatically creates a release on a tag push that
matches v*

create docker images on releases and pushes to master or develop

also a couple accidental changes i made in the wrong branch
@Baconing Baconing self-assigned this Dec 18, 2023
@frc5183 frc5183 deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Dec 18, 2023
@frc5183 frc5183 deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Dec 18, 2023
@Baconing
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The project has undergone a significant CI/CD overhaul, introducing automated release creation upon version tagging and Docker image builds for both development and main branches. Multi-stage Docker builds and configuration management improvements have been implemented, enhancing the efficiency and maintainability of the codebase.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/docker.yml Added release trigger, updated Docker metadata steps
.github/workflows/release.yml Modified job and artifact names, release creation steps
Dockerfile Implemented multi-stage build process
config/config.go Renamed variables and functions, added GetConfig
database/database.go Updated database config access method
docker-compose.yml.example Added new "beeapi" service configuration
main.go, routes/router.go, routes/utils.go Updated to use new config initialization methods

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Set up CI for automatic releases on v* tags (#2)
Configure Docker container for image creation on releases, master, and dev branches (#2)

Poem

In the codebase, changes bloom,
CI/CD dances to a new tune.
🚀 Releases fly on tag's sweet whisper,
Docker builds with a multi-stage glimmer.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ?


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • You can reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit.
  • You can tag CodeRabbit on specific lines of code or files in the PR by tagging @coderabbitai in a comment.
  • You can tag @coderabbitai in a PR comment and ask one-off questions about the PR and the codebase. Use quoted replies to pass the context for follow-up questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 4

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0050a14 and 6cbe6b9.
Files ignored due to filter (2)
  • go.mod
  • go.sum
Files selected for processing (9)
  • .github/workflows/docker.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • config/config.go (4 hunks)
  • database/database.go (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yml.example (1 hunks)
  • main.go (1 hunks)
  • routes/router.go (1 hunks)
  • routes/utils.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • Dockerfile
  • docker-compose.yml.example
Additional comments: 9
.github/workflows/docker.yml (1)
  • 3-51: The workflow is correctly set up to trigger Docker image builds and pushes on pushes to master and develop branches, and when a release is published. The Docker metadata action is properly configured to generate image tags based on the event type, and the Docker build and push action is set up with the necessary platforms. Ensure that the secrets and permissions are correctly set up in the repository settings to allow for Docker logins and image pushes to GHCR.
database/database.go (1)
  • 22-26: The changes to use GetConfig() for accessing configuration details are consistent with the PR objectives and improve the maintainability of the code by encapsulating the configuration access.
main.go (2)
  • 9-18: The main function now calls both routes.Init() and routes.RegisterRoutes(). Verify that the Init method in routes does not duplicate the functionality of RegisterRoutes to avoid redundant operations.

  • 4-18: Confirm that the main.go file is using the updated configuration access methods from config.go correctly, in line with the changes mentioned in the PR overview.

Verification successful

The verification process for main.go confirms that the file is using the updated configuration access methods correctly, in line with the changes mentioned in the PR overview. The old Configuration global variable and the GenerateConfig function are not used, and the Init method from the config package is being called as expected. No issues have been found in the context of the changes to main.go.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of the old Configuration global variable and the GenerateConfig function to ensure they are not used.
rg --type go 'Configuration' main.go
rg --type go 'GenerateConfig' main.go
# Search for the usage of the new conf variable and GetConfig function to ensure they are used correctly.
rg --type go 'conf' main.go
rg --type go 'GetConfig' main.go

Length of output: 167

routes/router.go (3)
  • 9-9: The router variable has been changed to a pointer of gin.Engine. Ensure that all parts of the codebase that interact with router are compatible with this change.
Verification successful

Given the absence of results from the initial scripts, I will generate new scripts to search for any usage of the router variable, including method calls or property accesses. Additionally, I will verify that the Init function is being called in the main.go file to ensure that router is properly initialized before use.


The Init function calls in main.go have been verified, confirming that the necessary initialization for config, database, and routes is in place. However, the verification of the router variable usage is incomplete. I will generate a new script to search for any interaction with the router variable in a broader sense.


The verification process has confirmed that the router variable is only used within the routes/router.go file, and the Init function responsible for its initialization is properly called in main.go. There are no indications of compatibility issues with other parts of the codebase due to the change in the router variable's type. The changes appear to be localized and correctly implemented.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct assignments to the `router` variable.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'var router = $_'
# Search for function calls that might pass `router` as an argument.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'$_($$$, router, $$$)'

Length of output: 102



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of the `router` variable, including method calls or property accesses.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'router.$_($$$)'
# Verify that the `Init` function is being called in the `main.go` file.
rg 'Init\(' main.go

Length of output: 116



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search for any interaction with the `router` variable.
rg 'router' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 49

* 15-21: The `Init` function is correctly setting the `gin` mode based on the configuration. However, ensure that `Init` is called before any routing functions such as `RegisterRoutes` to avoid nil pointer dereferences.
Verification successful

The Init function from the routes package is called before the RegisterRoutes function in the main.go file, which is the correct order to avoid nil pointer dereferences. The verification is successful.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the `Init` function call in the `main.go` file.
rg 'Init\(\)' main.go
# Search for the `RegisterRoutes` function call in the `main.go` file.
rg 'RegisterRoutes\(\)' main.go

Length of output: 129

* 23-25: The `RegisterRoutes` function iterates over the `routes` slice and registers each route. Ensure that `Init` is called before `RegisterRoutes` to initialize the `router` variable.
routes/utils.go (2)
  • 11-11: The change from direct access to the Configuration object to using the GetConfig() method is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives to refactor configuration access.

  • 8-14: Ensure that all references to the old Configuration global variable and the GenerateConfig function have been updated across the entire codebase to use the new GetConfig method and the conf variable.

Verification successful

The output from the shell scripts indicates that there are no remaining references to the old config.Configuration variable or the config.GenerateConfig function in the Go files of the codebase. This suggests that the necessary updates to use the new config.GetConfig method and the conf variable have been made.

The config.GetConfig method is being used in several places (routes/utils.go, routes/router.go, database/database.go), which confirms that the new method is in use and the codebase has been updated to reflect the changes made in the config/config.go file.

Based on the information provided, it appears that the changes have been correctly implemented across the codebase, and there are no remaining references to the old configuration access patterns.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the old Configuration variable usage.
rg --type go 'config\.Configuration'
# Search for the old GenerateConfig function usage.
rg --type go 'config\.GenerateConfig'
# Search for the new GetConfig method usage to ensure it's being used correctly.
rg --type go 'config\.GetConfig'

Length of output: 548

database/database.go Show resolved Hide resolved
config/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
config/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
database/database.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@Baconing Baconing linked an issue Dec 18, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
5 tasks
Copy link

@Trip-kun Trip-kun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm add more documentation to new code to match other code :)

Also make a go style guide or something. There's probably nothing wrong but writing up the standard would be good

@Baconing Baconing merged commit fdf18a8 into develop Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Release CI
2 participants