Make placeholder accessible #45
Conversation
![local-dev-korbit-ai-mentor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/318591?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![[local-dev] Korbit - AI Mentor](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/318591?s=40&u=4153787aed90096cc5d05c9c38a439007e524086&v=4){kind=avatar}
|
Clone of the PR facebook/lexical#6171 |
|
My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes! |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThese changes streamline the placeholder functionality across various components of the Lexical editor by removing the separate Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Editor
participant ContentEditable
User->>Editor: Type text
Editor->>ContentEditable: Update content
ContentEditable->>ContentEditable: Render placeholder if empty
ContentEditable->>User: Show placeholder
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| // TODO remove | ||
| function Placeholder({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Placeholder component is marked for removal, but it's still in the code. If it's no longer needed, it's best to remove it completely to avoid confusion and potential issues in the future. Just make sure it's not being used anywhere else before removing it.
Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.
| function Placeholder({ | ||
| content, | ||
| }: { | ||
| content: ((isEditable: boolean) => null | JSX.Element) | null | JSX.Element; | ||
| }): null | JSX.Element { | ||
| const [editor] = useLexicalComposerContext(); | ||
| const showPlaceholder = useCanShowPlaceholder(editor); | ||
| const editable = useLexicalEditable(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!showPlaceholder) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (typeof content === 'function') { | ||
| return content(editable); | ||
| } else { | ||
| return content; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new implementation of the placeholder as a separate component is a good step towards improving accessibility. However, we need to ensure that screen readers can properly announce the placeholder when the content editable area is empty. Consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes to the Placeholder component, such as aria-hidden="true" when the placeholder is not visible, and using aria-label or aria-labelledby to provide a descriptive text for screen readers when the placeholder is visible.
Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.
| type Props = { | ||
| className?: string; | ||
| placeholderClassName?: string; | ||
| placeholder: string; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The LexicalContentEditable component expects a placeholder prop, but it doesn't handle the case when the prop is not provided. This could lead to errors or unexpected behavior if the component is used without specifying a placeholder. Consider making the placeholder prop optional and providing a default value or handling the case when it is not provided to improve the component's robustness.
Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
/review |
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍(Review updated until commit af2b084)
|
github-actions
bot
added
Review effort [1-5]: 4
and removed
Review effort [1-5]: 3
labels
|
Persistent review updated to latest commit af2b084 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx (2)
19-20: Clarify the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that the
placeholderproperty will be removed. Ensure that there is a clear plan for its removal to avoid confusion in future iterations.- // TODO Remove. This property is now part of ContentEditable + // TODO: Remove this property in future versions as it is now part of ContentEditable.
43-43: ThePlaceholderfunction is still in use across the codebase.The
Placeholderfunction is defined and used in several files, includingLexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx,LexicalContentEditable.tsx, andLexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx. This indicates that its removal and replacement with an integrated approach inContentEditablehas not yet been completed. Please ensure that the transition plan is fully executed.
- Files with
Placeholderusage:
packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsxpackages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsxpackages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx- Additional occurrences in test fixtures and examples.
Analysis chain
Plan for removing the
Placeholderfunction.The
Placeholderfunction is marked for removal. Ensure that its usage is phased out and replaced with the integrated approach inContentEditable.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the `Placeholder` function to ensure it's phased out. # Test: Search for the `Placeholder` function usage. Expect: No occurrences outside this file. rg --type tsx -A 5 $'function Placeholder'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use ast-grep to find the definition and usage of the `Placeholder` function. # Search for the definition of the `Placeholder` function. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function Placeholder($_) { $$$ }' # Search for any usage of the `Placeholder` function. rg 'Placeholder('Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correct the rg command to search for the usage of the `Placeholder` function. # Search for any usage of the `Placeholder` function with corrected regex. rg 'Placeholder\('Length of output: 1897
packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx (2)
19-20: Clarify the TODO comment.Ensure the TODO comment provides a clear plan for the removal of the
placeholderproperty to avoid future confusion.- // TODO Remove. This property is now part of ContentEditable + // TODO: Remove this property in future versions as it is now part of ContentEditable.
43-43: ThePlaceholderfunction is still in use across the codebase. The function appears in multiple files, includingLexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx,LexicalContentEditable.tsx, andLexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx, as well as in example and test files. To align with the plan for its removal, ensure that its usage is phased out and replaced with the integrated approach inContentEditable.
packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsxpackages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsxpackages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx- Example and test files
Analysis chain
Plan for removing the
Placeholderfunction.The
Placeholderfunction is marked for removal. Ensure that its usage is phased out and replaced with the integrated approach inContentEditable.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the `Placeholder` function to ensure it's phased out. # Test: Search for the `Placeholder` function usage. Expect: No occurrences outside this file. rg --type tsx -A 5 $'function Placeholder'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the `Placeholder` function to ensure it's phased out. # Test: Search for the `Placeholder` function usage. Expect: No occurrences outside this file. rg -A 5 'function Placeholder'Length of output: 3699
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- examples/react-rich/src/App.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/Editor.tsx (4 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/ImageComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/InlineImageNode/InlineImageComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/StickyComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/plugins/CommentPlugin/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.css (1 hunks)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/lexical-react/flow/LexicalContentEditable.js.flow (1 hunks)
- packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/InlineImageNode/InlineImageComponent.tsx
- packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/StickyComponent.tsx
- packages/lexical-playground/src/plugins/CommentPlugin/index.tsx
Additional context used
Biome
packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx
[error] 19-19: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx
[error] 58-60: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (13)
packages/lexical-react/flow/LexicalContentEditable.js.flow (1)
12-18: Enhancement of Props type with accessibility in mind.The addition of
aria-placeholderand the flexibleplaceholderproperty enhances the accessibility and usability of theContentEditablecomponent. This change aligns well with modern accessibility practices.packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.css (1)
25-44: Improved styling for placeholder with responsive design.The addition of
.ContentEditable__placeholderstyles and the media query enhances the visual clarity and responsiveness of the placeholder text. This improves the user interface and ensures better usability across different devices.packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.tsx (1)
14-18: Expanded Props for enhanced customization.The introduction of
PropswithplaceholderandplaceholderClassNameallows for greater customization and accessibility of theLexicalContentEditablecomponent. The existing comment about handling the placeholder prop is still valid and should be addressed.packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx (1)
24-24: Optional placeholder prop.Marking the
placeholderprop as optional aligns with the integration intoContentEditable. This change simplifies the component's API.packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx (1)
24-24: Optional placeholder prop.Marking the
placeholderprop as optional aligns with the integration intoContentEditable. This change simplifies the component's API.examples/react-rich/src/App.tsx (2)
19-19: Simplified placeholder implementation.Replacing the
Placeholdercomponent with a constant string simplifies the code and maintains accessibility. This change is in line with the PR objectives.
42-45: Ensure accessibility witharia-placeholder.The use of
aria-placeholderenhances accessibility. Verify that this attribute is supported across all target browsers and screen readers.packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx (2)
31-41: Improve type safety and readability inContentEditable.The
ContentEditablefunction now uses a singlepropsargument, which enhances readability. Ensure that thepropsdestructuring is handled correctly and that the placeholder logic aligns with the accessibility improvements.
45-63: Ensure accessibility improvements inPlaceholder.The
Placeholdercomponent effectively encapsulates the placeholder logic. Ensure that thearia-placeholderattribute is used appropriately to enhance screen reader compatibility. Consider adding further ARIA attributes if needed.packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx (1)
14-27: Ensure comprehensive ARIA support inProps.The
Propstype includes various ARIA attributes, which is crucial for accessibility. Ensure all necessary attributes are covered and consider if any additional attributes are needed for specific use cases.packages/lexical-playground/src/Editor.tsx (2)
96-96: Consolidate placeholder logic for clarity.The
placeholdervariable is now defined using a conditional expression, which simplifies the logic. Ensure this logic correctly reflects the intended behavior for different editor states.
169-169: EnsureContentEditablereceives the correct placeholder.The
ContentEditablecomponent now directly receives theplaceholderprop, which simplifies the component structure. Verify that the placeholder text aligns with the editor's state and accessibility requirements.Also applies to: 224-224
packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/ImageComponent.tsx (1)
454-458: LGTM! VerifyContentEditableusage.The integration of
placeholderandplaceholderClassNameprops into theContentEditablecomponent is a positive change. It simplifies the component structure and aligns with accessibility improvements.Ensure that all usages of
ContentEditablein the codebase correctly handle these new props.Verification successful
ContentEditable usage verified.
The
ContentEditablecomponent is consistently used with theplaceholderandplaceholderClassNameprops across the codebase, confirming correct integration of these changes.
- Instances of
ContentEditablewithplaceholderandplaceholderClassNameare found in multiple files, ensuring consistent usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `ContentEditable` handle the new props. # Test: Search for the `ContentEditable` component usage. Expect: Correct handling of `placeholder` and `placeholderClassName` props. rg --type tsx -A 5 $'<ContentEditable'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all .tsx files and search for the usage of the ContentEditable component within them. fd --extension tsx --exec rg '<ContentEditable' -A 5Length of output: 5773
| export type Props = ( | ||
| | {} | ||
| | { | ||
| 'aria-placeholder': string; | ||
| placeholder: | ||
| | ((isEditable: boolean) => null | JSX.Element) | ||
| | null | ||
| | JSX.Element; | ||
| } | ||
| ) & | ||
| ElementProps; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor the Props type to avoid using {}.
Using {} as a type is discouraged because it means "any non-nullable value." Consider explicitly defining the object shape or using Record<string, unknown> if a more generic type is needed.
- export type Props = ({} | {
+ export type Props = ({Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
Biome
[error] 19-19: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| export function ContentEditableElement({ | ||
| ariaActiveDescendant, | ||
| ariaAutoComplete, | ||
| ariaControls, | ||
| ariaDescribedBy, | ||
| ariaExpanded, | ||
| ariaLabel, | ||
| ariaLabelledBy, | ||
| ariaMultiline, | ||
| ariaOwns, | ||
| ariaRequired, | ||
| autoCapitalize, | ||
| className, | ||
| id, | ||
| role = 'textbox', | ||
| spellCheck = true, | ||
| style, | ||
| tabIndex, | ||
| 'data-testid': testid, | ||
| ...rest | ||
| }: Props): JSX.Element { | ||
| const [editor] = useLexicalComposerContext(); | ||
| const [isEditable, setEditable] = useState(false); | ||
|
|
||
| const ref = useCallback( | ||
| (rootElement: null | HTMLElement) => { | ||
| // defaultView is required for a root element. | ||
| // In multi-window setups, the defaultView may not exist at certain points. | ||
| if ( | ||
| rootElement && | ||
| rootElement.ownerDocument && | ||
| rootElement.ownerDocument.defaultView | ||
| ) { | ||
| editor.setRootElement(rootElement); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| [editor], | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| useLayoutEffect(() => { | ||
| setEditable(editor.isEditable()); | ||
| return editor.registerEditableListener((currentIsEditable) => { | ||
| setEditable(currentIsEditable); | ||
| }); | ||
| }, [editor]); | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div | ||
| {...rest} | ||
| aria-activedescendant={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaActiveDescendant} | ||
| aria-autocomplete={!isEditable ? 'none' : ariaAutoComplete} | ||
| aria-controls={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaControls} | ||
| aria-describedby={ariaDescribedBy} | ||
| aria-expanded={ | ||
| !isEditable | ||
| ? undefined | ||
| : role === 'combobox' | ||
| ? !!ariaExpanded | ||
| : undefined | ||
| } | ||
| aria-label={ariaLabel} | ||
| aria-labelledby={ariaLabelledBy} | ||
| aria-multiline={ariaMultiline} | ||
| aria-owns={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaOwns} | ||
| aria-readonly={!isEditable ? true : undefined} | ||
| aria-required={ariaRequired} | ||
| autoCapitalize={autoCapitalize} | ||
| className={className} | ||
| contentEditable={isEditable} | ||
| data-testid={testid} | ||
| id={id} | ||
| ref={ref} | ||
| role={role} | ||
| spellCheck={spellCheck} | ||
| style={style} | ||
| tabIndex={tabIndex} | ||
| /> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize the use of optional chaining in ContentEditableElement.
The ref callback could benefit from using optional chaining to safely access defaultView.
- if (rootElement && rootElement.ownerDocument && rootElement.ownerDocument.defaultView) {
+ if (rootElement?.ownerDocument?.defaultView) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function ContentEditableElement({ | |
| ariaActiveDescendant, | |
| ariaAutoComplete, | |
| ariaControls, | |
| ariaDescribedBy, | |
| ariaExpanded, | |
| ariaLabel, | |
| ariaLabelledBy, | |
| ariaMultiline, | |
| ariaOwns, | |
| ariaRequired, | |
| autoCapitalize, | |
| className, | |
| id, | |
| role = 'textbox', | |
| spellCheck = true, | |
| style, | |
| tabIndex, | |
| 'data-testid': testid, | |
| ...rest | |
| }: Props): JSX.Element { | |
| const [editor] = useLexicalComposerContext(); | |
| const [isEditable, setEditable] = useState(false); | |
| const ref = useCallback( | |
| (rootElement: null | HTMLElement) => { | |
| // defaultView is required for a root element. | |
| // In multi-window setups, the defaultView may not exist at certain points. | |
| if ( | |
| rootElement && | |
| rootElement.ownerDocument && | |
| rootElement.ownerDocument.defaultView | |
| ) { | |
| editor.setRootElement(rootElement); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| [editor], | |
| ); | |
| useLayoutEffect(() => { | |
| setEditable(editor.isEditable()); | |
| return editor.registerEditableListener((currentIsEditable) => { | |
| setEditable(currentIsEditable); | |
| }); | |
| }, [editor]); | |
| return ( | |
| <div | |
| {...rest} | |
| aria-activedescendant={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaActiveDescendant} | |
| aria-autocomplete={!isEditable ? 'none' : ariaAutoComplete} | |
| aria-controls={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaControls} | |
| aria-describedby={ariaDescribedBy} | |
| aria-expanded={ | |
| !isEditable | |
| ? undefined | |
| : role === 'combobox' | |
| ? !!ariaExpanded | |
| : undefined | |
| } | |
| aria-label={ariaLabel} | |
| aria-labelledby={ariaLabelledBy} | |
| aria-multiline={ariaMultiline} | |
| aria-owns={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaOwns} | |
| aria-readonly={!isEditable ? true : undefined} | |
| aria-required={ariaRequired} | |
| autoCapitalize={autoCapitalize} | |
| className={className} | |
| contentEditable={isEditable} | |
| data-testid={testid} | |
| id={id} | |
| ref={ref} | |
| role={role} | |
| spellCheck={spellCheck} | |
| style={style} | |
| tabIndex={tabIndex} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| export function ContentEditableElement({ | |
| ariaActiveDescendant, | |
| ariaAutoComplete, | |
| ariaControls, | |
| ariaDescribedBy, | |
| ariaExpanded, | |
| ariaLabel, | |
| ariaLabelledBy, | |
| ariaMultiline, | |
| ariaOwns, | |
| ariaRequired, | |
| autoCapitalize, | |
| className, | |
| id, | |
| role = 'textbox', | |
| spellCheck = true, | |
| style, | |
| tabIndex, | |
| 'data-testid': testid, | |
| ...rest | |
| }: Props): JSX.Element { | |
| const [editor] = useLexicalComposerContext(); | |
| const [isEditable, setEditable] = useState(false); | |
| const ref = useCallback( | |
| (rootElement: null | HTMLElement) => { | |
| // defaultView is required for a root element. | |
| // In multi-window setups, the defaultView may not exist at certain points. | |
| if (rootElement?.ownerDocument?.defaultView) { | |
| editor.setRootElement(rootElement); | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| [editor], | |
| ); | |
| useLayoutEffect(() => { | |
| setEditable(editor.isEditable()); | |
| return editor.registerEditableListener((currentIsEditable) => { | |
| setEditable(currentIsEditable); | |
| }); | |
| }, [editor]); | |
| return ( | |
| <div | |
| {...rest} | |
| aria-activedescendant={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaActiveDescendant} | |
| aria-autocomplete={!isEditable ? 'none' : ariaAutoComplete} | |
| aria-controls={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaControls} | |
| aria-describedby={ariaDescribedBy} | |
| aria-expanded={ | |
| !isEditable | |
| ? undefined | |
| : role === 'combobox' | |
| ? !!ariaExpanded | |
| : undefined | |
| } | |
| aria-label={ariaLabel} | |
| aria-labelledby={ariaLabelledBy} | |
| aria-multiline={ariaMultiline} | |
| aria-owns={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaOwns} | |
| aria-readonly={!isEditable ? true : undefined} | |
| aria-required={ariaRequired} | |
| autoCapitalize={autoCapitalize} | |
| className={className} | |
| contentEditable={isEditable} | |
| data-testid={testid} | |
| id={id} | |
| ref={ref} | |
| role={role} | |
| spellCheck={spellCheck} | |
| style={style} | |
| tabIndex={tabIndex} | |
| /> | |
| ); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 58-60: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
|
/korbit-review |
![[development] Korbit - AI Mentor](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/334508?s=40&u=8e7ea115878aacba56242d7ac87807ea98eac709&v=4){kind=avatar}
@furwellness I have started a new review of this pull request. You will see my feedback shortly. |
1 similar comment
@furwellness I have started a new review of this pull request. You will see my feedback shortly. |
![development-korbit-ai-mentor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/334508?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @development-korbit-ai-mentor in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Manual ( /korbit-review)Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ❌ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ❌ Logging ❌ Error Handling ❌ Systems and Environment ❌ Objects and Data Structures ❌ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ❌ Asynchronous Processing ❌ Design Patterns ❌ Third-Party Libraries ❌ Performance ❌ Security ✅ Functionality ❌ Feedback and Support
|
Mapping from the Github issue to the LangSmith prompt that generated the issue: |
|
System configuration at time of review: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary by Korbit AI
Code Execution Comments
- Ensure the
placeholderprop is optional and handle undefined or empty strings while maintaining ARIA attributes for accessibility.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
| type Props = { | ||
| className?: string; | ||
| placeholderClassName?: string; | ||
| placeholder: string; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle undefined or empty placeholder prop.
Consider handling cases where the placeholder prop might be undefined or an empty string. You could make the placeholder prop optional in the Props type and add a condition to only render the placeholder content when a non-empty string is provided. This will ensure the component behaves correctly in all scenarios.
Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.
| export function ContentEditable(props: Props): JSX.Element { | ||
| let placeholder = null; | ||
| if ('placeholder' in props) { | ||
| placeholder = props.placeholder; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div | ||
| {...rest} | ||
| aria-activedescendant={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaActiveDescendant} | ||
| aria-autocomplete={!isEditable ? 'none' : ariaAutoComplete} | ||
| aria-controls={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaControls} | ||
| aria-describedby={ariaDescribedBy} | ||
| aria-expanded={ | ||
| !isEditable | ||
| ? undefined | ||
| : role === 'combobox' | ||
| ? !!ariaExpanded | ||
| : undefined | ||
| } | ||
| aria-label={ariaLabel} | ||
| aria-labelledby={ariaLabelledBy} | ||
| aria-multiline={ariaMultiline} | ||
| aria-owns={!isEditable ? undefined : ariaOwns} | ||
| aria-readonly={!isEditable ? true : undefined} | ||
| aria-required={ariaRequired} | ||
| autoCapitalize={autoCapitalize} | ||
| className={className} | ||
| contentEditable={isEditable} | ||
| data-testid={testid} | ||
| id={id} | ||
| ref={ref} | ||
| role={role} | ||
| spellCheck={spellCheck} | ||
| style={style} | ||
| tabIndex={tabIndex} | ||
| /> | ||
| <> | ||
| <ContentEditableElement {...props} /> | ||
| <Placeholder content={placeholder} /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing ARIA attributes in ContentEditable component.
The new implementation of the ContentEditable component seems to have removed the handling of several ARIA attributes that were present in the previous version (such as aria-activedescendant, aria-autocomplete, aria-controls, etc.). To maintain the same level of accessibility, we should ensure these attributes are still being applied appropriately. Consider passing these attributes through to the ContentEditableElement component or handling them within the ContentEditable component.
Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.
|
/korbit-review |
@kavitaganeshan I have started a new review of this pull request. You will see my feedback shortly. |
1 similar comment
@kavitaganeshan I have started a new review of this pull request. You will see my feedback shortly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| examples/react-rich/src/App.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/Editor.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/ImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/InlineImageNode/InlineImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/StickyComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/plugins/CommentPlugin/index.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.css | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @development-korbit-ai-mentor in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Manual ( /korbit-review)Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ❌ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ❌ Logging ❌ Error Handling ❌ Systems and Environment ❌ Objects and Data Structures ❌ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ❌ Asynchronous Processing ❌ Design Patterns ❌ Third-Party Libraries ❌ Performance ❌ Security ✅ Functionality ❌ Feedback and Support
|
Mapping from the Github issue to the LangSmith prompt that generated the issue: |
|
System configuration at time of review: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| examples/react-rich/src/App.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/Editor.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/ImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/InlineImageNode/InlineImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/StickyComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/plugins/CommentPlugin/index.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
|
/korbit-review |
@kavitaganeshan I have started a new review of this pull request. You will see my feedback shortly. |
1 similar comment
@kavitaganeshan I have started a new review of this pull request. You will see my feedback shortly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| examples/react-rich/src/App.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/Editor.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/ImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/InlineImageNode/InlineImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/StickyComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/plugins/CommentPlugin/index.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.css | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @development-korbit-ai-mentor in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Manual ( /korbit-review)Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ❌ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ❌ Logging ❌ Error Handling ❌ Systems and Environment ❌ Objects and Data Structures ❌ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ❌ Asynchronous Processing ❌ Design Patterns ❌ Third-Party Libraries ❌ Performance ❌ Security ✅ Functionality ❌ Feedback and Support
|
Mapping from the Github issue to the LangSmith prompt that generated the issue: |
|
System configuration at time of review: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| examples/react-rich/src/App.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/Editor.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/ImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/InlineImageNode/InlineImageComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/nodes/StickyComponent.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/plugins/CommentPlugin/index.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-playground/src/ui/ContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalContentEditable.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalPlainTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/LexicalRichTextPlugin.tsx | ✅ |
| packages/lexical-react/src/shared/LexicalContentEditableElement.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Placeholder won't read to screen readers, it technically can be read but it is not in the expected position in the flow. Instead, it should use
placeholderaria-placeholderon the contenteditable.Placeholder is now part of the ContentEditable (backward compatible for now), for two reasons:
contenteditablewith the placeholder. That's how nativeplaceholderandinputwork.Before, doesn't read, interferes with the flow:
Screen.Recording.2024-05-24.at.3.15.28.PM.mov
After:
Screen.Recording.2024-05-24.at.3.28.28.PM.mov
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Refactor the placeholder implementation to improve accessibility by integrating the placeholder directly into the
ContentEditablecomponent and removing the separatePlaceholdercomponent.Why are these changes being made?
This change simplifies the codebase by consolidating placeholder logic within the
ContentEditablecomponent, ensuring that placeholders are more accessible and reducing redundancy. This approach also enhances maintainability and aligns with best practices for accessibility.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ContentEditablecomponent, enhancing user experience and accessibility.ContentEditableElementcomponent that supports various ARIA attributes for better accessibility.Bug Fixes
Style