-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 923
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edited training material "Automated Cell Annotation" upto slide 10 #5604
Open
MD-Chem
wants to merge
4
commits into
galaxyproject:main
Choose a base branch
from
MD-Chem:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ | |||||
|
||||||
### What is Cell Annotation? | ||||||
|
||||||
- Categorising cells into cell type categories based on transcriptomic data | ||||||
- Classify cells in your data into different cell types based on gene expression data | ||||||
|
||||||
- Can be done manually or automatically | ||||||
|
||||||
- Is possible due to single-cell sequencing technology | ||||||
- Single-cell sequencing technology provides higher resolution than bulk RNA-seq | ||||||
|
||||||
![Basic pipeline for automated cell annotation](../../images/scrna-cell-annotation/cell-annotation.png) | ||||||
|
||||||
|
@@ -52,9 +52,35 @@ | |||||
|
||||||
--- | ||||||
|
||||||
### Why is it Important? | ||||||
### Why is Cell Annotation Important? | ||||||
|
||||||
- Able to process and analyse single cell data much faster than manual analysis | ||||||
|
||||||
- To understand the composition of cell types in samples (cellular heterogeneity) | ||||||
|
||||||
- To compare changes in cell populations or states across different condition and phenotypes | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
|
||||||
- To perform differential expression within each cell type to avoid signal dilution from mixed cell type population | ||||||
|
||||||
- To identify novel cell states and study some cell population further | ||||||
|
||||||
??? | ||||||
|
||||||
The power of single-cell RNA-seq lies in its ability to capture the transcriptome at single-cell resolution. | ||||||
|
||||||
However, a significant challenge is accurately classifying cells into distinct types before beginning downstream analysis. | ||||||
|
||||||
Once cells are annotated, we can examine the composition of cell types within each sample and compare them across conditions. | ||||||
|
||||||
This precise classification enables differential expression analysis within specific cell types, a key objective of single-cell experiments. | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
--- | ||||||
|
||||||
### Why Automate Cell Annotation? | ||||||
|
||||||
- Each single-cell experiment can generate data for thousands of cells | ||||||
|
||||||
- Manual annotation is time consuming and requires domain expertise | ||||||
|
||||||
- Can produce results more consistently allowing for reproducibility of results | ||||||
|
||||||
|
@@ -84,7 +110,7 @@ | |||||
|
||||||
- Cell annotation uses sc-RNA seq data | ||||||
|
||||||
- Gene expressions are stored in a gene expression matrix (X) | ||||||
- Gene expressions are stored in a gene expression matrix (X) <br><br> | ||||||
|
||||||
Common data types: | ||||||
|
||||||
|
@@ -106,14 +132,19 @@ | |||||
|
||||||
--- | ||||||
|
||||||
### Challenges | ||||||
### Challenges in Automated Cell Type Annotation | ||||||
|
||||||
- Noise due to amplification techniques, varying sequencing depths, and sequencing errors | ||||||
|
||||||
- Data is often noisy due to amplification techniques, varying sequencing depths, and errors in the reads | ||||||
- Difference in QC steps for reference and query dataset may introduce a bias | ||||||
|
||||||
- Cell type definitions are inherently subjective and may be suboptimal | ||||||
|
||||||
- Lack of a suitable reference panel for the query dataset can result in inaccurate classification, especially when dealing with unknown cell states | ||||||
|
||||||
- Dealing with unknown cell types due to undiscovered classifications | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
??? | ||||||
|
||||||
There are some challenges that need to be faced in order to perform automated cell annotation: | ||||||
|
@@ -128,9 +159,11 @@ | |||||
|
||||||
### Manual Cell Annotation | ||||||
|
||||||
- Generate a cluster map and manually annotate each clusters | ||||||
- Requires known marker genes for cell types of interest | ||||||
|
||||||
- Generate the UMAP/tSNE (see below) to visualize the expression values | ||||||
|
||||||
- Requires the researchers to find known marker genes in the data | ||||||
- If you have clustered the cells, you can use dotplots or violin plots to measure the average expression of these genes | ||||||
|
||||||
![Various cell cluster diagrams showing the expression values of various marker genes](../../images/scrna-cell-annotation/manual-annotation.png) | ||||||
|
||||||
|
@@ -154,7 +187,7 @@ | |||||
|
||||||
.pull-left[ | ||||||
|
||||||
- The process of identifying unique gene expressions that can be used for identifying cell types | ||||||
- The process of identifying genes that are uniquely expressed in certain cell types | ||||||
|
||||||
- Genes are selected based on how differently they are expressed across different cell types | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like this point is missing something to explicitly link it to the cell annotation - maybe combine it with the start of the old version like 'Is possible because single-cell seq tech provides higher res...'?