Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(profiles): Add an optional client SDK field for Sample V2 format #3882

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

phacops
Copy link
Contributor

@phacops phacops commented Jul 31, 2024

We'd like to collect SDK name and version for continuous profiling. This will have an optional field for the SDK to pass this information.

It's meant to be compatible with

pub struct ClientSdkInfo {
but working with serde.

@phacops phacops requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2024 19:52
Copy link
Member

@jjbayer jjbayer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR title says "mandatory", should it say "optional"?

@phacops
Copy link
Contributor Author

phacops commented Aug 1, 2024

The PR title says "mandatory", should it say "optional"?

Yes, definitely.

@phacops phacops changed the title feat(profiles): Add a mandatory client SDK field feat(profiles): Add an optional client SDK field for Sample V2 format Aug 1, 2024
@phacops phacops enabled auto-merge (squash) August 1, 2024 19:26
@phacops phacops merged commit 09f0897 into master Aug 2, 2024
24 checks passed
@phacops phacops deleted the pierre/profile-chunks-add-client-sdk-field branch August 2, 2024 13:32
Zylphrex added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
Similar to #3882, but for the existing formats. Extract the sdk info from the
transaction event.
Zylphrex added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
Similar to #3882, but for the existing formats. Extract the sdk info
from the transaction event.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants