-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(on_demand): Support epm and eps operators #56598
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #56598 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 78.63% 78.63%
========================================
Files 5083 5084 +1
Lines 219080 219212 +132
Branches 37093 37113 +20
========================================
+ Hits 172266 172379 +113
- Misses 41239 41254 +15
- Partials 5575 5579 +4
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Elegant solution!
The implementation looks good to me and test coverage seems sufficient. Considering that these functions cannot be used from alerts, this should be safe to merge.
"epm": "on_demand_epm", | ||
"eps": "on_demand_eps", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should you also add mappings for tpm
and tps
here, or is that converted somewhere upstream of the extraction module?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tpm
and tps
cannot be used in widgets.
It's a concept within Performance transaction summaries.
Fixes #56572