Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCT-1959 Launching projects view focuses on project search on mobile #424

Conversation

aziolek
Copy link
Member

@aziolek aziolek commented Sep 24, 2024

Description

Definition of Done

  1. If required, the desciption of your change is added to the QA changelog
  2. Acceptance criteria are met.
  3. PR is manually tested before the merge by developer(s).
    • Happy path is manually checked.
  4. PR is manually tested by QA when their assistance is required (1).
    • Octant Areas & Test Cases are checked for impact and updated if required (2).
  5. Unit tests are added unless there is a reason to omit them.
  6. Automated tests are added when required.
  7. The code is merged.
  8. Tech documentation is added / updated, reviewed and approved (including mandatory approval by a code owner, should such exist for changed files).
    • BE: Swagger documentation is updated.
  9. When required by QA:
    • Deployed to the relevant environment.
    • Passed system tests.

(1) Developer(s) in coordination with QA decide whether it's required. For small tickets introducing small changes QA assistance is most probably not required.

(2) Octant Areas & Test Cases.

Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 24, 2024

@aziolek aziolek changed the title fix: remove autofocus OCT-1959 Launching projects view focuses on project search on mobile Sep 24, 2024
@aziolek aziolek merged commit 67773a8 into feature/oct-1857-octant-client-v1.5 Sep 25, 2024
31 checks passed
@aziolek aziolek deleted the fix/oct-1959-projects-input-autofocus branch September 25, 2024 08:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants