-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Data sync status] Improve sync status labels and/or UX #2866
Comments
|
I think i remember @gino-m you talking about grouping these also by survey? I took a stab at rearranging some of the type hierarchy |
Do you mean the survey name? --> Still pertains to issue #2690. Without a textblock feature, giving text instructions remains tricky. If you mean creating an FR for changing the terms (Synced --> Uploaded, etc...), I may just quickly change the strings.xml and do a pull request. |
Yes, I was referring to differentiating upload tasks by survey name/title. I think this issue is sufficient to track. Not sure how this is related to #2690. |
Ah, I only see it now. Was too stuck on the awfully long title in picture 1. Ok! |
@amegantz In that case we might as well just say "Uploading", since I don't think adding "data" will help the user understand it's only the form data that's uploading
Only photos for now. Updated suggestions:
@amegantz Should we use "Complete" or "Done" to indicate an upload is finished? |
@amegantz And I spoke on chat yesterday; we probably need to take a step back and simplify the experience. A great example of how this could work from Drive (cropping out UI elements which don't apply here): When there are uploads but no connection, a message is shown: And uploads appear as: Perhaps we could use the Material Uploading: We don't have a thumbnail image for uploads, but could show a spinner on the right-hand side. We could initially use an infinite spinner and say something like "Uploading...", later replacing with an actual progress spinner. When done: Note the upload time, which we currently display, but we probably should. @rawbzz Wdyt? Could we adapt these principles to simplify the Upload status screen? |
@kenstershiro This is an incremental improvement, not sure it needs full pm/ux review. Please add back the label if you disagree. |
Nice work, @rawbzz! A few suggestions:
|
If uploaded date is its own column, where would the status's go (synced /uploading) or do we not need that text and just have icons? Also can you give an example of a job title and site/LOI name/ID so I can try to mock it up? |
I think just having icons is sufficient. For the layout w/o columns, perhaps the essential info can be stacked, similar to how it's shown in the Google Drive upload screen? (partial snippets above) |
@rawbzz Yes! That feels simpler and cleaner IMO. Should we still show both "Collected/saved" date in addition to "Uploaded" date? Would "Job name" and "Site ID/name" show in the place of "Date type"..? On one line or two? Example job: "Map agricultural areas" |
@jo-spek @jabramowitz5 We spoke about this but I can't find an FR or notes.
We should also precede the site name with the marker icon and move it above the user's name data, since it's the primary entity to which the submissions are attached.
Current screen:
@amegantz @rawbzz Wdyt?
We should also update
Mutation.SyncStatus
to reflect these labels.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: