Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax codecov check constraints #2610

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gino-m
Copy link
Collaborator

@gino-m gino-m commented Aug 7, 2024

@sufyanAbbasi PTAL to upblock #2598

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.97%. Comparing base (278387f) to head (819911c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2610   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     56.97%   56.97%           
  Complexity     1342     1342           
=========================================
  Files           318      318           
  Lines          7143     7143           
  Branches        890      890           
=========================================
  Hits           4070     4070           
  Misses         2564     2564           
  Partials        509      509           
Flag Coverage Δ
service 56.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@sufyanAbbasi sufyanAbbasi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@gino-m gino-m merged commit f3bcc18 into master Aug 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@gino-m gino-m deleted the gino-m/patch/relax-codecov branch August 7, 2024 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants