fix: [#280] add wrap for sql #719
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the database schema management components, particularly affecting the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 9edde4c | Previous: ab4c85c | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Fatal |
2e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
1e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op |
2 |
Benchmark_Fatal - ns/op |
2e-7 ns/op |
1e-7 ns/op |
2 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #719 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.63% 69.73% +0.10%
==========================================
Files 201 202 +1
Lines 15816 15875 +59
==========================================
+ Hits 11013 11071 +58
+ Misses 4205 4201 -4
- Partials 598 603 +5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
hwbrzzl
force-pushed
the
bowen/#280-19
branch
from
e9047c6
to
2cf94e0
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go (1)
Line range hint
37-39: Consider implementing the TODO test case.The
TestGetTypesfunction is currently empty with a TODO comment. Since this PR modifies schema handling, it would be beneficial to implement this test to ensure type handling works correctly with the new identifier wrapping.Would you like me to help implement the
TestGetTypestest case or create a GitHub issue to track this task?database/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go (1)
22-70: Consider adding more test cases for edge cases and negative scenarios.While the current test coverage is good for basic scenarios, consider adding tests for:
Edge cases:
- Identifiers containing special characters
- Reserved SQL keywords (e.g., "select", "where", "group")
- Unicode characters in identifiers
Negative test cases:
- Invalid identifiers
- SQL injection attempts
Consider refactoring similar tests using table-driven tests for better maintainability.
Example of table-driven test approach:
func (s *WrapTestSuite) TestColumn() { tests := []struct { name string input string expected string }{ { name: "with alias", input: "column as alias", expected: `"column" as "prefix_alias"`, }, { name: "without alias", input: "column", expected: `"column"`, }, { name: "with reserved keyword", input: "select", expected: `"select"`, }, // Add more test cases } for _, tt := range tests { s.Run(tt.name, func() { result := s.wrap.Column(tt.input) s.Equal(tt.expected, result) }) } }database/schema/grammars/wrap.go (2)
8-16: Add documentation for the Wrap type and constructor.Consider adding GoDoc comments to explain the purpose of the Wrap type and its constructor. This will help other developers understand how to use this package correctly.
+// Wrap handles SQL identifier wrapping with optional table prefixing type Wrap struct { tablePrefix string } +// NewWrap creates a new Wrap instance with the specified table prefix func NewWrap(tablePrefix string) *Wrap {
42-52: Improve readability of the Segments method.The method logic is correct, but variable names could be more descriptive.
func (r *Wrap) Segments(segments []string) string { - for i, segment := range segments { + for i, identifier := range segments { if i == 0 && len(segments) > 1 { - segments[i] = r.Table(segment) + segments[i] = r.Table(identifier) } else { - segments[i] = r.Value(segment) + segments[i] = r.Value(identifier) } }database/schema/schema.go (1)
44-54: Consider adding documentation about identifier wrapping.Since this PR introduces significant changes in how SQL identifiers are wrapped, it would be helpful to add documentation comments explaining:
- The new identifier wrapping behavior
- How prefixes interact with wrapped identifiers
- Any special considerations for different database drivers
Add documentation above the grammar initialization:
switch driver { case contractsdatabase.DriverPostgres: + // NewPostgres creates a Postgres grammar that properly wraps table names, + // column names, and other identifiers with double quotes to handle special + // characters and reserved keywords. The prefix is prepended to table names + // before wrapping. schema := config.GetString(fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.search_path", orm.Name()), "public")database/schema/blueprint.go (2)
84-86: Consider implementing the Postgres schema support.The TODO comment indicates missing Postgres schema support. This could be important for proper identifier quoting in schema-qualified table names.
Would you like me to help implement the Postgres schema support or create an issue to track this?
209-222: Consider enhancing the index name creation logic.The changes correctly handle schema-qualified table names and prefix application. However, consider these improvements:
- Add documentation explaining the index name format and rules
- Make the string manipulation more robust using a helper function
Consider refactoring like this:
func (r *Blueprint) createIndexName(ttype string, columns []string) string { + // Format: <schema>_<prefix>_<table>_<columns>_<type> + // Example: public_goravel_users_id_name_index var table string if strings.Contains(r.table, ".") { lastDotIndex := strings.LastIndex(r.table, ".") table = r.table[:lastDotIndex+1] + r.prefix + r.table[lastDotIndex+1:] } else { table = r.prefix + r.table } index := strings.ToLower(fmt.Sprintf("%s_%s_%s", table, strings.Join(columns, "_"), ttype)) - index = strings.ReplaceAll(index, "-", "_") - index = strings.ReplaceAll(index, ".", "_") + // Replace invalid characters with underscore + replacer := strings.NewReplacer("-", "_", ".", "_") + index = replacer.Replace(index) return index }database/schema/grammars/sqlite_test.go (4)
25-41: Consider adding edge cases to foreign key testsWhile the current test cases cover basic foreign key functionality, consider adding tests for:
- Table/column names containing spaces or special characters
- Reserved SQL keywords as identifiers
- Empty or invalid references
104-120: Consider reducing test duplicationThe foreign key configurations in the test are nearly identical. Consider extracting the common configuration into a test helper or using table-driven tests to improve maintainability.
type foreignKeyTest struct { columns []string on string references []string onDelete string onUpdate string } testCases := []foreignKeyTest{ { columns: []string{"role_id", "permission_id"}, on: "roles", references: []string{"id"}, onDelete: "cascade", onUpdate: "restrict", }, // Add more test cases here }
131-140: Consider expanding index test coverageWhile the basic index creation is tested, consider adding tests for:
- UNIQUE indexes
- Descending indexes (column DESC)
- Partial indexes with WHERE clauses
- Concurrent index creation
142-162: Consider testing additional column types and constraintsThe test covers basic column types well, but consider adding tests for:
- JSON/JSONB columns
- ENUM types
- CHECK constraints
- COLLATE clauses
- GENERATED columns
database/schema/blueprint_test.go (1)
142-145: Enhance test coverage for schema-qualified tablesWhile the test case correctly verifies schema-qualified table names, consider adding more test cases to cover:
- Different schema names (not just "public")
- Edge cases with special characters in schema names
- Multiple dots in table names
Example addition:
s.blueprint.table = "public.users" name = s.blueprint.createIndexName("index", []string{"id", "name-1", "name.2"}) s.Equal("public_goravel_users_id_name_1_name_2_index", name) + +// Test custom schema +s.blueprint.table = "custom_schema.users" +name = s.blueprint.createIndexName("index", []string{"id"}) +s.Equal("custom_schema_goravel_users_id_index", name) + +// Test schema name with special characters +s.blueprint.table = "my-schema.users" +name = s.blueprint.createIndexName("index", []string{"id"}) +s.Equal("my_schema_goravel_users_id_index", name)database/schema/grammars/postgres_test.go (1)
88-102: LGTM: Comprehensive drop operation test coverageThe new test methods thoroughly cover various PostgreSQL drop operations with proper identifier quoting and schema qualification.
Consider using a table-driven test to reduce code duplication across these similar drop operation tests. Example:
func (s *PostgresSuite) TestCompileDropAll() { tests := []struct { name string method func([]string) string command string input []string expected string }{ { name: "Domains", method: s.grammar.CompileDropAllDomains, command: "domain", input: []string{"domain", "user.email"}, expected: `drop domain "domain", "user"."email" cascade`, }, // Add other cases... } for _, tt := range tests { s.Run(tt.name, func() { s.Equal(tt.expected, tt.method(tt.input)) }) } }database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go (1)
81-83: Verify wrapping of index names inCompileIndexThe
CompileIndexmethod wraps the index name usingr.wrap.Column(command.Index). Ensure thatcommand.Indexrefers to a column name rather than an index name. If it's an index name, consider creating a dedicated wrap method for index names to maintain clarity and correctness.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
mocks/database/schema/Grammar.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
contracts/database/schema/grammar.go(0 hunks)database/schema/blueprint.go(4 hunks)database/schema/blueprint_test.go(2 hunks)database/schema/grammars/postgres.go(5 hunks)database/schema/grammars/postgres_test.go(5 hunks)database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go(6 hunks)database/schema/grammars/sqlite_test.go(3 hunks)database/schema/grammars/utils.go(0 hunks)database/schema/grammars/utils_test.go(0 hunks)database/schema/grammars/wrap.go(1 hunks)database/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/index.go(2 hunks)database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go(1 hunks)database/schema/schema.go(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- contracts/database/schema/grammar.go
- database/schema/grammars/utils.go
- database/schema/grammars/utils_test.go
🔇 Additional comments (44)
database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go (1)
34-34: LGTM! Verify test coverage for prefix handling.
The change to include the "goravel_" prefix in schema initialization is consistent with the PR's objective to enhance SQL identifier handling.
Let's verify if all test cases properly handle the new prefix:
✅ Verification successful
Prefix handling is properly implemented and tested
The verification shows that:
- The "goravel_" prefix is consistently used in the test file and its implementation
- The test cases in
TestParseSchemaAndTablecorrectly handle both prefixed and non-prefixed scenarios - The grammar tests in
grammars/postgres_test.gothoroughly verify prefix wrapping for all SQL operations - All SQL identifiers are properly wrapped with quotes and prefixes in the test assertions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any hardcoded table names in tests that might need updating
# for the new prefix system
# Search for table names in test assertions
rg -l 'Equal.*".*table' --type go
# Search for SQL statements in test files that might need wrapping
rg -l 'CREATE TABLE [^"]' --type go
Length of output: 539
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual test cases in postgres_schema_test.go to verify prefix handling
cat database/schema/postgres_schema_test.go
# Also check the implementation of NewPostgres to understand prefix usage
ast-grep --pattern 'func NewPostgres($$$) $$ {
$$$
}'
# Check other schema test files for consistency
fd postgres.*test.go$ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 18124
database/schema/grammars/wrap_test.go (2)
1-8: LGTM! Clean package structure and imports.
1-70: Verify SQL compatibility with different database engines.
While the tests verify the wrapping syntax, it would be valuable to ensure the wrapped identifiers work correctly with different SQL databases, especially for edge cases.
Let's check if there are any integration tests that verify this:
database/schema/index.go (2)
11-14: LGTM! Verify impact on existing foreign key definitions.
The simplified constructor aligns with the PR objectives. However, we should verify that existing foreign key definitions are properly handled with this change.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the foreign key definition usage to verify the impact.
Let me check one final aspect about the usage of foreign keys in the actual implementation.
Removal of prefix parameter is safe and correctly implemented
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase:
- The
ForeignKeyDefinitionstruct only contains acommandfield, with no prefix-related fields - All foreign key methods (
On,References,CascadeOnDelete, etc.) operate solely on the command object - Test cases show foreign keys are created and used without any prefix dependencies
- The change aligns with the PR's objective of properly handling SQL identifiers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing foreign key definitions that might be affected
# by the removal of prefix parameter
# Search for foreign key creation patterns
rg -A 3 "Foreign\("
# Search for potential custom foreign key handling
rg -l "ForeignKeyDefinition"
Length of output: 4625
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of Foreign method and its usage of NewForeignKeyDefinition
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_ Blueprint) Foreign($$$) {
$$$
return NewForeignKeyDefinition($$$)
}'
# Check for any prefix-related code in foreign key definitions
rg -A 5 "prefix.*Foreign|Foreign.*prefix"
# Check the actual implementation of ForeignKeyDefinition struct
ast-grep --pattern 'type ForeignKeyDefinition struct {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of methods in ForeignKeyDefinition
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ *ForeignKeyDefinition) $_($$$) $$$'
# Check for any test cases that might show the usage pattern
rg -A 5 "NewForeignKeyDefinition|Foreign\(" database/schema/*_test.go
Length of output: 17411
29-32: Verify table name wrapping implementation.
The removal of prefix handling from the On method suggests that table name wrapping should be handled elsewhere. Please ensure:
- Table names are properly wrapped with quotes as per PR objectives
- Documentation is updated to reflect this behavioral change
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the table name wrapping implementation.
The previous search showed a lot of mock calls but not the actual implementation. Let's look specifically at the schema package and foreign key related code to understand how table names are handled.
Let me search for more context around the foreign key and table name handling implementation.
I want to understand how table names are handled in the grammar implementations and if there are any tests that verify this behavior.
Let me check one more thing to understand how the table name wrapping is handled in the grammar implementations.
I want to verify how table names are wrapped and if there's proper handling in the grammar implementations.
Based on the code review, I can now provide a final response about the table name wrapping concern.
Table name wrapping is properly handled in the grammar layer
The review shows that:
-
The table prefix is correctly applied in multiple layers:
- In schema layer (
database/schema/schema.go):NewBlueprint(r.prefix, table) - In specific database implementations (e.g.
sqlite_schema.go,postgres_schema.go):table = r.prefix + table
- In schema layer (
-
Foreign key references are properly wrapped with the prefix as shown in the SQLite test:
references "goravel_roles"("id", "user_id") references "goravel_permissions"("id", "user_id")
-
The removal of prefix handling from the
Onmethod is correct because:- Table name prefixing is handled at the grammar layer
- The test cases demonstrate proper prefixing of both the main table and referenced tables
- This aligns with the PR's objective to handle SQL identifiers at the grammar level
No documentation update is needed since this is an internal implementation detail and the behavior remains consistent from the user's perspective.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify table name wrapping implementation and usage
# Search for table name handling patterns
rg -A 3 '\.On\("'
# Look for potential documentation that needs updating
fd -e md | xargs rg -l "foreign|table.*prefix"
Length of output: 381279
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for table name wrapping implementation in schema package
ast-grep --pattern 'func $name($args) $ret {
$$$
$table = $prefix + $table
$$$
}'
# Search for table name wrapping in foreign key related code
rg -A 5 'func.*On.*table.*string.*ForeignKeyDefinition'
# Search for table name wrapping tests
rg -A 5 'Test.*ForeignKey.*On'
Length of output: 1356
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for table name wrapping in grammar implementations
rg -A 10 'CompileForeign.*func'
# Look for table prefix handling in grammar files
rg -A 5 'prefix.*table' database/schema/
# Search for foreign key related tests
fd -e go | xargs rg -l 'TestForeignKey|Test.*Foreign.*Key'
Length of output: 5194
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look at the SQLite grammar test file for foreign key handling
cat database/schema/grammars/sqlite_test.go
# Check the grammar implementations for table wrapping
rg -A 10 'func.*wrap.*[Tt]able' database/schema/grammars/
# Look for table name handling in the base grammar
rg -A 10 'CompileForeign' database/schema/grammars/grammar.go
Length of output: 7573
database/schema/grammars/wrap.go (3)
1-6: LGTM! Clean package structure and imports.
68-74: LGTM! Correct identifier quoting implementation.
The method properly handles PostgreSQL identifier quoting rules, including proper escaping of double quotes and special handling of wildcards.
54-66: Verify handling of table names with multiple dots.
The current implementation assumes a simple schema.table format, but database objects can have more complex paths (e.g., catalog.schema.table).
database/schema/schema.go (2)
44-44: LGTM: Grammar initialization with prefix parameter.
The changes consistently pass the table prefix to both Postgres and SQLite grammar constructors, which is necessary for proper identifier wrapping in SQL statements.
Also applies to: 52-52
125-125: Verify table name handling edge cases.
While the simplified table name construction works for basic cases, we should verify:
- How special characters in prefix/name are handled
- If this approach is consistent with table name handling in other methods
- If the grammar's Wrap functionality is properly applied when executing the query
Let's verify the table name handling across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the shell script outputs, I can now provide a final response regarding the table name handling concern:
Direct concatenation of table prefix is safe and consistent
The codebase shows that:
- The prefix concatenation pattern is consistently used across the codebase (seen in schema.go, sqlite_schema.go, postgres_schema.go)
- Table names are properly escaped/wrapped before being used in SQL queries through the grammar's Wrap functionality (grammars/wrap.go)
- The table prefix handling is consistent with the ORM layer (database/gorm/query.go also uses prefix concatenation)
The direct concatenation approach is safe because:
- Table names are always wrapped/escaped before being used in SQL queries
- The grammar layer handles proper quoting and escaping of identifiers
- The same pattern is used consistently across different database drivers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check table name handling patterns and potential edge cases
# Test 1: Check for other direct prefix concatenations
echo "Checking for direct prefix concatenations..."
rg -A 2 "prefix \+ [a-zA-Z]" --type go
# Test 2: Check for Wrap method usage on table names
echo "Checking for Wrap method usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Wrap($table)'
# Test 3: Check for table name handling in tests
echo "Checking test cases for table name handling..."
fd -e go -E vendor --exec rg -l "prefix.*test.*table"
Length of output: 1335
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify how table names are used in queries and if they're properly escaped
# Check for query building patterns
echo "Checking query building patterns..."
rg -A 3 "(?i)select.*from.*\b${?table" --type go
rg -A 3 "(?i)create.*table.*\b${?table" --type go
# Check for SQL injection prevention mechanisms
echo "Checking SQL safety mechanisms..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Quote($table)'
ast-grep --pattern 'QuoteIdentifier($table)'
ast-grep --pattern 'Escape($table)'
# Check for table name validation or sanitization
echo "Checking table name validation..."
rg -A 2 "ValidateTable|validateTable|SanitizeTable|sanitizeTable" --type go
# Check test files for prefix handling
echo "Checking test cases for prefix handling..."
fd "_test.go" --exec rg -l "prefix.*table"
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how table names are handled in queries
# Check for query building patterns with table names
echo "Checking query patterns..."
rg -A 3 'SELECT.*FROM.*\$\{?table' --type go
rg -A 3 'CREATE.*TABLE.*\$\{?table' --type go
# Check grammar.go and related files for table name handling
echo "Checking grammar implementations..."
fd "grammar.*.go" --exec cat {}
# Check for table name related methods
echo "Checking table name methods..."
rg -A 3 "func.*Table" --type go
# Look for SQL builder patterns
echo "Checking SQL builder patterns..."
rg -A 3 "BuildQuery|CompileSelect|CompileCreate" --type go
Length of output: 65111
database/schema/blueprint.go (2)
Line range hint 1-222: Verify implementation of SQL identifier quoting.
While the changes in this file handle table name and index generation well, I don't see the implementation of SQL identifier quoting (wrapping identifiers in quotes) as mentioned in the PR objectives. This might be implemented in the Grammar implementations.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for SQL identifier quoting implementation
# Expect: Find where identifiers are wrapped in quotes
# Search for potential SQL generation with quoted identifiers
rg -l 'fmt\.Sprintf.*"[^"]*".*"' --type go
# Search for Grammar implementations
fd -e go -x grep -l "CompileCreate"67-67: LGTM! Verify foreign key definition handling.
The removal of prefix parameter from NewForeignKeyDefinition aligns with the architectural changes.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of prefix parameter from NewForeignKeyDefinition is correct
The verification shows that:
NewForeignKeyDefinitiontakes only aCommandparameter and always has- The
Commandstruct contains all necessary fields (Name,References, etc.) to handle foreign key definitions - No prefix field exists in either
CommandorForeignKeyDefinitionstructs
The removal of the prefix parameter is consistent with the codebase structure, as table name handling is managed through the Command struct fields.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify foreign key definition handling in tests
# Expect: Tests should cover the new foreign key definition behavior
rg -l "NewForeignKeyDefinition" --type go
Length of output: 704
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation and usage of NewForeignKeyDefinition
ast-grep --pattern 'func NewForeignKeyDefinition($$$) $$ {
$$$
}'
# Also check for its usages
rg "NewForeignKeyDefinition" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 1673
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of ForeignKeyDefinition to verify prefix handling
ast-grep --pattern 'type ForeignKeyDefinition struct {
$$$
}'
# Also check the Command struct to understand how it handles table names
ast-grep --pattern 'type Command struct {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1387
database/schema/grammars/sqlite_test.go (3)
22-23: LGTM: Grammar initialization with prefix
The initialization of SQLite grammar with the "goravel_" prefix aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing SQL identifier handling.
58-58: LGTM: Proper identifier wrapping in alter table statement
The test correctly verifies that table names and column names are properly quoted in the alter table statement.
128-129: LGTM: Proper DROP TABLE statement verification
The test correctly verifies that the DROP TABLE statement includes both the table prefix and proper quoting.
database/schema/blueprint_test.go (2)
27-27: LGTM: Grammar initialization with prefix
The initialization of Postgres grammar with the "goravel_" prefix aligns with the PR's objective to enhance SQL syntax handling.
Line range hint 1-290: Verify prefix wrapping in all test methods
Let's ensure that all test methods consistently handle the new wrapping functionality with the "goravel_" prefix.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the test coverage for prefix handling with one more verification to check the actual implementation:
Prefix handling is adequately tested across test methods
The verification shows that prefix handling is properly tested:
- The prefix is consistently initialized in
SetupTestfor all test methods - Prefix concatenation is explicitly tested in
TestCreateIndexNamefor both simple and schema-qualified tables - The implementation in
Blueprintcorrectly handles prefix in all scenarios (simple table names and schema-qualified tables) - All test methods inherit the properly initialized prefix from
SetupTest
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all test methods properly handle the prefix wrapping
# Look for test methods that might need prefix verification
rg -n "func.*Test.*" database/schema/blueprint_test.go
# Check for prefix usage in assertions
rg -n "\"goravel_" database/schema/blueprint_test.go
# Look for potential missing prefix checks
rg -n "s\.Equal\(.*\".*_.*\"" database/schema/blueprint_test.go
Length of output: 1346
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Blueprint implementation to understand prefix handling
ast-grep --pattern 'func NewBlueprint($_, $_) *Blueprint {
$$$
}'
# Check for any other prefix-related methods
rg -n "prefix" database/schema/blueprint.go
Length of output: 320
database/schema/grammars/postgres_test.go (7)
22-22: LGTM: Grammar initialization with prefix
The initialization of PostgreSQL grammar with the "goravel_" prefix is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing table naming.
41-41: LGTM: Proper identifier quoting in ALTER TABLE statement
The test correctly validates that table and column names are properly quoted in the ALTER TABLE statement.
84-85: LGTM: Proper identifier quoting in CREATE TABLE statement
The test correctly validates that all identifiers (table name and column names) are properly quoted in the CREATE TABLE statement.
128-144: LGTM: Comprehensive foreign key constraint testing
The test cases properly validate foreign key constraints with:
- Multiple column support
- Proper identifier quoting
- Optional ON DELETE/UPDATE clauses
158-198: LGTM: Well-structured index creation tests
The test cases thoroughly validate index creation with:
- Optional USING clause for index algorithm
- Proper identifier quoting
- Multiple column support
200-207: LGTM: Primary key constraint test
The test correctly validates composite primary key creation with proper identifier quoting.
209-232: LGTM: Comprehensive column definition tests
The test thoroughly validates column definition generation with:
- Serial columns for auto-increment
- VARCHAR with length specification
- Default values
- NULL/NOT NULL constraints
- Proper identifier quoting
database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go (10)
15-16: Addition of tablePrefix and wrap fields enhances SQL wrapping functionality
The introduction of tablePrefix and wrap fields into the Sqlite struct allows for consistent and flexible wrapping of table and column names with the specified prefix throughout the SQL generation process.
36-36: Ensure r.getColumn handles modifiers correctly
In CompileAdd, after wrapping the table name and getting the column definition, confirm that r.getColumn applies all necessary modifiers to the column definition to generate accurate SQL statements.
41-41: Correct usage of r.wrap.Table in CompileCreate
Using r.wrap.Table(blueprint.GetTableName()) ensures that the table name is properly quoted, adhering to the goal of wrapping identifiers to prevent SQL errors with reserved keywords.
68-68: Proper wrapping of table name in drop statement
In CompileDropIfExists, the table name is correctly wrapped with r.wrap.Table, ensuring that the generated SQL handles table names with special characters or reserved words appropriately.
180-181: Correctly wrapping primary key columns
In addPrimaryKeys, using r.wrap.Columns(command.Columns) ensures that all primary key columns are properly quoted, which aligns with the new wrapping functionality for SQL identifiers.
183-189: Efficient column retrieval with getColumns method
The new getColumns method improves code readability and modularity by centralizing the logic for generating column definitions. This change facilitates easier maintenance and potential future enhancements.
192-199: Accurate construction of column definitions in getColumn
The getColumn method systematically constructs each column's SQL definition, including the application of modifiers. This ensures that all aspects of the column, such as type, default values, and constraints, are correctly reflected in the generated SQL.
204-206: Proper wrapping in foreign key constraints
In the getForeignKey method, using r.wrap to quote table and column names in foreign key definitions ensures that references are accurate and immune to SQL syntax issues related to naming conflicts or reserved words.
19-24:
Update constructor NewSqlite to include tablePrefix parameter
The NewSqlite function now requires a tablePrefix argument. Ensure that all instantiations of Sqlite are updated to pass the appropriate tablePrefix to prevent compilation errors and maintain expected behavior.
You can run the following script to identify any calls to NewSqlite that may need updating:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual implementation and usage context of these matches to verify if they are related to the same NewSqlite function.
Review comment is incorrect - different NewSqlite functions
The matches found are for a different NewSqlite function in the processors package (database/schema/processors/sqlite.go), which is unrelated to the NewSqlite constructor in database/schema/grammars/sqlite.go. Let's verify all usages of the grammar's NewSqlite function.
All usages of NewSqlite grammar constructor are properly updated
The only usage of the grammar's NewSqlite constructor is in database/schema/schema.go where it's already being called with the prefix parameter: sqliteGrammar := grammars.NewSqlite(prefix). The other matches found in the previous search were for a different NewSqlite function in the processors package. All code is properly aligned with the constructor's new signature.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of NewSqlite without the new parameter
# Expected result: No matches or all usages include the required parameter
rg 'NewSqlite\(\)'
Length of output: 221
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files containing NewSqlite matches
echo "=== database/schema/sqlite_schema.go ==="
cat database/schema/sqlite_schema.go
echo -e "\n=== database/schema/processors/sqlite_test.go ==="
cat database/schema/processors/sqlite_test.go
echo -e "\n=== database/schema/processors/sqlite.go ==="
cat database/schema/processors/sqlite.go
# Also check the imports in these files to ensure we're looking at the right NewSqlite
echo -e "\n=== Checking imports ==="
rg "^import" -A 5 database/schema/sqlite_schema.go database/schema/processors/sqlite_test.go database/schema/processors/sqlite.go
Length of output: 5980
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find usages of grammars.NewSqlite
rg "grammars\.NewSqlite" -B 2 -A 2
# Also check for any direct imports and usage of the sqlite grammar
rg '"github.com/goravel/framework/database/schema/grammars"' -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2527
88-88: Review replacement of dots in table names
Replacing dots with double underscores using strings.ReplaceAll(table, ".", "__") in CompileIndexes may not be necessary and could lead to incorrect table references. Verify whether this transformation is required, and if so, document the rationale to aid future maintainability.
You can check for table names containing dots with the following script:
✅ Verification successful
The context shows that the dot replacement in table names is specific to SQLite's index compilation, and there's a clear reason for this transformation. Let me generate the final response:
Dot replacement in SQLite table names is necessary and correct
The transformation of dots to double underscores in CompileIndexes is a required SQLite-specific handling. SQLite uses dots for namespacing in its schema queries (as seen in sqlite_master queries), so table names containing dots need to be escaped for proper index creation.
- The replacement is used only in the SQLite grammar implementation, not in other database drivers
- It's specifically scoped to index compilation, where table name escaping is critical
- The codebase shows consistent handling of SQLite table names across schema operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find table names containing dots to assess the need for replacement
# Expected result: List of table names with dots, if any
rg 'create table ["]?\w+[.]\w+["]?'
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any usage of table names with dots in the codebase
rg -g '*.go' '"\w+\.\w+"' -A 2 -B 2
# Also search for any other instances where table names with dots are handled
rg -g '*.go' 'ReplaceAll\(.+\"\.\".+\)'
# Let's also check the implementation context of this method
ast-grep --pattern 'func (r $_) CompileIndexes($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 132281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of CompileIndexes and surrounding context
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($r $_) CompileIndexes($table string, $blueprint $_) string {
$$$
}'
# Let's also check for any other instances where table names with dots are handled in schema-related code
rg -g '*.go' -B 2 -A 2 'strings\.ReplaceAll.*table.*\.'
# And check for any schema-related tests that might provide context
rg -g '*_test.go' 'CompileIndexes.*table'
Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how SQLite tables are handled in the codebase
rg -g '*.go' -B 5 -A 5 'type Sqlite struct'
# Check for any SQLite-specific table handling tests
rg -g '*_test.go' -B 3 -A 3 'sqlite.*table'
# Look for any documentation or comments about SQLite table naming
rg -g '*.go' -A 3 'SQLite.*table|sqlite.*table' -i
# Check for any other instances of table name transformations in SQLite code
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($r *Sqlite) $_($table string, $$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6406
database/schema/grammars/postgres.go (10)
16-16: Addition of wrap field to Postgres struct
The inclusion of the wrap field enhances the Postgres struct by encapsulating the logic for wrapping table and column names, improving code organization and maintainability.
35-35: Use wrap methods in CompileAdd for consistent identifier wrapping
The update to use r.wrap.Table() and r.getColumn() in CompileAdd ensures that table and column names are properly quoted, preventing issues with reserved keywords and improving cross-database compatibility.
39-39: Use wrap methods in CompileCreate for consistent identifier wrapping
Applying r.wrap.Table() and r.getColumns() in CompileCreate aligns with the goal of correctly quoting table and column names, enhancing SQL syntax compatibility.
43-43: Consistent use of wrap methods in drop and alter statements
The methods CompileDropAllDomains, CompileDropAllTables, CompileDropAllTypes, CompileDropAllViews, and CompileDropIfExists now utilize r.wrap methods to properly quote identifiers, enhancing SQL syntax correctness and preventing potential conflicts with reserved words.
Also applies to: 47-47, 51-51, 55-55, 59-59
64-68: Verify wrapping of constraint and index names in CompileForeign
While wrapping table and column names is necessary, wrapping constraint and index names (e.g., command.Index) using r.wrap.Column() may not be appropriate. Quoting constraint names could lead to syntax issues in some SQL dialects. Please verify if wrapping constraint names is compatible with the target database systems.
To check for potential issues, review the generated SQL statements for foreign key constraints and test them against your supported databases.
86-89: Assess wrapping of index names in CompileIndex
Wrapping the index name using r.wrap.Column(command.Index) may not be necessary and could cause issues, as index names are identifiers that typically do not require quoting. Verify whether wrapping index names is appropriate and consistent with SQL standards across different databases.
Consider testing the generated index creation statements to ensure they execute successfully on your target database systems.
106-107: Confirm proper usage of r.wrap.Quote() in CompileIndexes
The use of r.wrap.Quote(table) and r.wrap.Quote(schema) ensures that table and schema names are properly quoted in the SQL query. Verify that r.wrap.Quote() handles these names correctly and does not introduce any issues in the context of PostgreSQL.
112-112: Use wrap methods in CompilePrimary for consistent identifier wrapping
Updating CompilePrimary to use r.wrap.Table() and r.wrap.Columns() ensures that identifiers are correctly quoted, aligning with the objective to enhance SQL compatibility by properly wrapping identifiers.
206-224: Addition of getColumns and getColumn methods to centralize column definition logic
The introduction of getColumns and getColumn methods improves code maintainability by centralizing the logic for generating column definitions. This change enhances readability and simplifies future modifications.
19-19: Update NewPostgres constructor to accept tablePrefix parameter
The NewPostgres constructor now requires a tablePrefix parameter and initializes the wrap field with it. Ensure that all instances where NewPostgres is called have been updated to include this new parameter to prevent potential runtime errors.
Run the following script to find all usages of NewPostgres without the tablePrefix argument:
Also applies to: 23-23
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if these matches are related to the NewPostgres constructor in question by checking the imports and context.
From the results, I can see that the NewPostgres() matches are for a different type in the processors package, not the grammars.NewPostgres constructor we're concerned about. Let me search specifically for usages of the grammar's NewPostgres constructor.
All usages of NewPostgres constructor have been updated with the required tablePrefix parameter
The verification shows that all instances where grammars.NewPostgres is called already include the tablePrefix parameter:
schema.go:grammars.NewPostgres(prefix)postgres_schema_test.go:grammars.NewPostgres("goravel_")blueprint_test.go:grammars.NewPostgres("goravel_")
The earlier matches we found were for a different NewPostgres() function in the processors package, not the grammar constructor we're concerned about.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all calls to NewPostgres without parameters.
# Test: Search for calls to NewPostgres without any arguments.
rg --fixed-strings 'NewPostgres()' --glob '!database/schema/grammars/postgres.go'
Length of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check imports and context of the found matches
echo "=== Checking postgres_schema.go ==="
rg -B5 -A5 'NewPostgres\(\)' database/schema/postgres_schema.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking imports in postgres_schema.go ==="
rg '^import \($|^\)' -A 20 database/schema/postgres_schema.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking processors/postgres.go ==="
rg -B5 -A5 'NewPostgres\(\)' database/schema/processors/postgres.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking processors/postgres_test.go ==="
rg -B5 -A5 'NewPostgres\(\)' database/schema/processors/postgres_test.go
Length of output: 2452
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports and usages of grammars.NewPostgres
echo "=== Searching for grammars.NewPostgres usage ==="
rg "grammars\.NewPostgres" -B2 -A2
echo -e "\n=== Searching for NewPostgres with package alias ==="
# First find potential package aliases
rg '^\s*"github\.com/goravel/framework/database/schema/grammars"(\s+as\s+(\w+))?' -A1
Length of output: 2377
📑 Description
Add wrap for table, column, index, etc:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Wrapstruct for managing SQL table and column naming conventions with a specified prefix.Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation
✅ Checks