Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backend: Better formatting settings #3104

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hannibal002
Copy link
Owner

What

Apparently, they are better now. I'd like to have feedback from others that actually know what they are doing.
This no longer breaks my auto-formatting (makes it so that IntelliJ formatting doesn't break detekt rules)

Changelog Technical Details

  • Made Detekt and .editorconfig rules better. - hannibal2

@github-actions github-actions bot added Backend A backend pull request that will be merged soon Detekt Has detekt problem labels Dec 21, 2024
Copy link

One or more Detekt Failures were detected:

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Detekt Has detekt problem label Dec 21, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@CalMWolfs CalMWolfs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have a custom rule for annotation spacing in detekt so that it works with preprocessed comments. Add whatever you are trying to do into that custom rule instead.

Unfortunately there is no way to have preprocessing comments while also having it follow typical kotlin formatting standards unless we want to duplicate lines

@hannibal002 hannibal002 added this to the Version 0.28 milestone Dec 22, 2024
@hannibal002 hannibal002 enabled auto-merge (squash) December 22, 2024 00:21
@hannibal002 hannibal002 merged commit 74ed374 into beta Dec 22, 2024
11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Backend A backend pull request that will be merged soon label Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants