This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 8, 2020. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I suggest the following small fix with the following reasoning:
amtRead
in functionLinuxProcessList_readCmdlineFile
are meant to protect the execution of the for loop (and what follows it), which is not supposed to be run withamtRead == 0
(if I understand correctly),LinuxProcessList_recurseProcTree
at line 883 after the "offending" call toLinuxProcessList_readCmdlineFile
at line 856.To me this is a quick fix and the setting of command name of processes seems a little bit clumsy (i.e.
readCmdlineFile
is not just reading, but actually setting the command name of a process and classifying it as a kernel thread), however, I lack the insight as well as experience to write it better. Maybe setting the command name of a zombie process should also be moved toreadCmdlineFile
and the function renamed. Please, let me know what you think about it.This closes issue #930.