feat(ci/pr): build OS configurations #107
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
steveej
changed the title
steveej
force-pushed
the
ci-nix-eval
branch
7 times, most recently
from
1add610
to
20e4fb8
Compare
…equests `nix building` a derivation that pulls in all existing darwin/nixos configurations seemed the simplest option here.
this must have gotten lost in an erroneous merge
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #93.
fixes #94.
nix building a derivation that pulls in all existing darwin/nixos configurations seemed the simplest option here.51 minutes is on the longer side of CI runs, however IMO it's acceptable when building OS configurations on free github runners. i'm curious to see how the "magic-nix-cache" helps for subsequent runs.
result/