You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems pretty easy to introduce bugs in the code... might make sense to do some simple tests... also we can leverage antithesis, which we have access to ... yay
I'm thinking we want some type of done(id: int) packet a bot can send and the server can send an ack(id: int) packet back to confirm that the packet has been received. See https://xeiaso.net/blog/nosleep/ ... we don't want to rely on sleeping for arbitrary amounts
Let's not actually make a brand new packet ID but use plugin message channels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems pretty easy to introduce bugs in the code... might make sense to do some simple tests... also we can leverage antithesis, which we have access to ... yay
Example issues we run into
#702 (comment)
Verifying packets have been processed
I'm thinking we want some type of done(id: int) packet a bot can send and the server can send an
ack(id: int)
packet back to confirm that the packet has been received. See https://xeiaso.net/blog/nosleep/ ... we don't want to rely on sleeping for arbitrary amountsLet's not actually make a brand new packet ID but use plugin message channels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: