-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add execute & query view json function to cli cmd #232
Conversation
sh-cha
commented
Jul 19, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- add execute_json tx cmd
- add view_json query cmd
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe updates enhance the command structure in the CLI for querying and executing functions within a module. Key changes include renaming an existing query command for clarity, adding a new query command to return results in JSON format, and introducing new transaction commands that allow execution of entry functions and scripts using JSON-like arguments. These changes improve the usability and flexibility of the CLI commands for querying and executing functions. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant Module
User ->> CLI: Execute GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
CLI ->> Module: Query View Function with JSON args
Module -->> CLI: JSON results
CLI -->> User: Display JSON results
User ->> CLI: Execute ExecuteJSONCmd
CLI ->> Module: Execute Entry Function with JSON args
Module -->> CLI: Execution result
CLI -->> User: Display execution result
User ->> CLI: Execute ScriptJSONCmd
CLI ->> Module: Execute Script with JSON args
Module -->> CLI: Script execution result
CLI -->> User: Display script result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #232 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.24% 39.95% -0.29%
==========================================
Files 259 259
Lines 24643 24816 +173
==========================================
- Hits 9918 9916 -2
- Misses 13191 13365 +174
- Partials 1534 1535 +1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
x/move/client/cli/tx.go (1)
204-235
: Add tests forExecuteJSONCmd
functionThe function
ExecuteJSONCmd
appears to be correctly implemented, but there is no evidence of associated test coverage. It is crucial to add unit tests to ensure the function behaves as expected and handles all edge cases.
- Add unit tests for the
ExecuteJSONCmd
function inx/move/client/cli/tx.go
.Analysis chain
Verify the correctness and completeness of the function implementation.
Ensure that the function
ExecuteJSONCmd
is correctly implemented, follows best practices, and handles errors appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and completeness of the function `ExecuteJSONCmd`. # Test: Search for the function implementation and usage. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go 'func ExecuteJSONCmd'Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the full implementation of the function `ExecuteJSONCmd` ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ExecuteJSONCmd($_) $_ { $$$ }' --json # Search for where the function `ExecuteJSONCmd` is invoked or referenced in the codebase rg 'ExecuteJSONCmd' -A 5 # Check for any associated tests with `ExecuteJSONCmd` rg 'ExecuteJSONCmd' --type go -g '*_test.go' -A 5Length of output: 6208
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any test files that might cover the functionality provided by `ExecuteJSONCmd` indirectly rg 'execute_json' --type go -g '*_test.go' -A 5Length of output: 47
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 204-235: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L204-L235
Added lines #L204 - L235 were not covered by testsx/move/client/cli/query.go (2)
35-36
: Ensure test coverage for the new command.The command
GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
is correctly integrated into thequeryCmd
command group. However, there are no associated test cases found. Please add test cases to ensure the functionality of this new command.
- Define test cases for
GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
in the appropriate test files.Analysis chain
Verify the integration of the new command.
Ensure that the
GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
command is correctly integrated and functions as expected.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new command `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. # Test: Search for the new command usage. Expect: Integration with `GetQueryCmd`. rg --type go 'GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction'Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the registration and test coverage of the new command `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. # Test 1: Check if the new command is registered in the command group. rg --type go 'AddCommand' -A 5 # Test 2: Check for test coverage of the new command. rg --type go 'GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction' --glob '*_test.go'Length of output: 6868
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 35-36: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L35-L36
Added lines #L35 - L36 were not covered by tests
366-397
: Add test cases forGetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
.It appears that there are no existing test cases covering the
GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
. To ensure its functionality is properly verified, please add relevant test cases.
- Location:
x/move/client/cli/query.go
Analysis chain
Verify the correctness and completeness of the function implementation.
Ensure that the function
GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction
is correctly implemented, follows best practices, and handles errors appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness and completeness of the function `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. # Test: Search for the function implementation and usage. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go 'func GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction'Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the function `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction($_) *cobra.Command { $$$ }' # Search for test cases related to `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. rg --type go 'GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction'Length of output: 5141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test files that might cover the functionality of `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. rg --type go 'GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction' --glob '*_test.go' # Search for test functions that might indirectly test `GetCmdQueryViewJSONFunction`. rg --type go 'view_json'Length of output: 235
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 366-397: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L366-L397
Added lines #L366 - L397 were not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/move/client/cli/query.go (3 hunks)
- x/move/client/cli/tx.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/move/client/cli/tx.go
[warning] 32-32: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests
[warning] 204-235: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L204-L235
Added lines #L204 - L235 were not covered by tests
[warning] 237-239: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L237-L239
Added lines #L237 - L239 were not covered by tests
[warning] 241-248: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L241-L248
Added lines #L241 - L248 were not covered by tests
[warning] 250-257: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L250-L257
Added lines #L250 - L257 were not covered by tests
[warning] 259-262: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L259-L262
Added lines #L259 - L262 were not covered by tests
[warning] 264-275: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L264-L275
Added lines #L264 - L275 were not covered by tests
[warning] 277-277: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L277
Added line #L277 was not covered by tests
[warning] 281-284: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L281-L284
Added lines #L281 - L284 were not covered by testsx/move/client/cli/query.go
[warning] 35-36: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L35-L36
Added lines #L35 - L36 were not covered by tests
[warning] 275-275: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L275
Added line #L275 was not covered by tests
[warning] 366-397: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L366-L397
Added lines #L366 - L397 were not covered by tests
[warning] 399-402: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L399-L402
Added lines #L399 - L402 were not covered by tests
[warning] 404-411: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L404-L411
Added lines #L404 - L411 were not covered by tests
[warning] 413-420: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L413-L420
Added lines #L413 - L420 were not covered by tests
[warning] 422-438: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L422-L438
Added lines #L422 - L438 were not covered by tests
[warning] 441-444: x/move/client/cli/query.go#L441-L444
Added lines #L441 - L444 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (1)
x/move/client/cli/tx.go (1)
32-32
: Verify the integration of the new command.Ensure that the
ExecuteJSONCmd
command is correctly integrated and functions as expected.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 32-32: x/move/client/cli/tx.go#L32
Added line #L32 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM