Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release: prepare v0.6.2 release #307

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

release: prepare v0.6.2 release #307

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Contributor

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Nov 21, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2024 08:52
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on updating the version of the upgrade in the app/upgrade.go file from "0.6.0" to "0.6.2". The RegisterUpgradeHandlers function has been significantly modified, with the removal of various code blocks related to the upgrade process. This includes the elimination of logic for publishing new code modules, updating VM data, and handling checksums. The remaining implementation simplifies the upgrade process by invoking the SetUpgradeHandler method without executing the previously defined upgrade steps.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/upgrade.go Updated upgrade version from "0.6.0" to "0.6.2". Removed code blocks for publishing modules, updating VM data, and error handling. Simplified RegisterUpgradeHandlers to only invoke SetUpgradeHandler.

Poem

In fields of code where rabbits play,
An upgrade hops in, brightening the day.
From "0.6.0" to "0.6.2" it leaps,
With simpler paths, no tangled heaps.
A swift handler calls, the old ways shed,
A fresh new start, onward we tread! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a3d125 and a20515c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.mod is excluded by !**/*.mod
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum, !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/upgrade.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/upgrade.go (2)

10-10: Update upgradeName to match the release version

The upgradeName constant has been updated to "0.6.2", which correctly reflects the new release version.


12-17: Ensure upgrade handler includes necessary migration logic

The RegisterUpgradeHandlers function sets an upgrade handler for "0.6.2" that currently performs no upgrade steps and returns the existing vm unmodified. If there are any state migrations, parameter updates, or other upgrade logic required for this release, please include them in the upgrade handler. If no migrations are necessary, it's acceptable to leave the handler as is.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 2 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

go.mod

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
github.com/initia-labs/OPinit0.6.0NullUnknown License
github.com/initia-labs/OPinit/api0.6.0NullUnknown License
Denied Licenses: GPL-1.0-or-later, LGPL-2.0-or-later

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
gomod/github.com/initia-labs/OPinit 0.6.0 UnknownUnknown
gomod/github.com/initia-labs/OPinit/api 0.6.0 UnknownUnknown

Scanned Files

  • go.mod

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.11%. Comparing base (99721d0) to head (a20515c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #307      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.04%   41.11%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         268      268              
  Lines       25728    25682      -46     
==========================================
  Hits        10559    10559              
+ Misses      13532    13486      -46     
  Partials     1637     1637              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
app/upgrade.go 50.00% <ø> (+44.23%) ⬆️
---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit a58daf9 into main Nov 21, 2024
15 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the release/v0.6.2 branch November 21, 2024 09:07
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant