-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SYCL][HIP][CUDA] Use new version of piMemGetNativeHandle and add test #12297
Conversation
Lint failing because of #12199 (comment) |
Converting to draft while UR changes are still in flight. |
This PR is blocking the following two PRs on oneMKL as all the buffer tests (with accessor interop) are failing for the rocblas backend with PI_ERROR_INVALID_OPERATION. Logs: |
037bbf6
to
eb331f1
Compare
Friendly ping @intel/dpcpp-nativecpu-pi-reviewers @intel/unified-runtime-reviewers |
oneapi-src/unified-runtime#1226 needs to merged and the UR tag updated before the UR changes can be approved. |
OK sure. I will add the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Native CPU lgtm, thank you
@kbenzie is it not worth reviewing this before oneapi-src/unified-runtime#1226 is merged? oneapi-src/unified-runtime#1226 is an ABI breaking change so once it is merged, this should be merged immediately. |
594a185
to
b68761c
Compare
b68761c
to
0c9cf59
Compare
@intel/llvm-reviewers-cuda @intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime please review |
Co-authored-by: ldrumm <ldrumm@rtps.co>
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
Add a comment describing what test4 does and change assert(0) to exit(1) in check helper and also fix clang-format
db726dd
to
32f957c
Compare
Remove some redundant parts of test and add descriptive names
@ldrumm do these changes address your concerns? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ldrumm do these changes address your concerns?
Looks like github auto-resolved some of my comments but I don't see that material changes have been made. Other than them it looks ready
Co-authored-by: ldrumm <ldrumm@rtps.co>
@ldrumm I actually had forgotten to push to the remote last night before finishing. I have just done so and your changes should all have been made. Let me know what you think |
@intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime would really appriciate getting this reviewed ASAP as this is holding up other UR changes. |
Thanks. This looks good. |
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please merge |
We want to change the signature of
piMemGetNativeHandle
for reasons explained here oneapi-src/unified-runtime#1199Corresponding UR PR: oneapi-src/unified-runtime#1226
A previous PR added a new entry point #12199 but it was decided that it is better to modify the existing entry point