[SYCL][NFC] Reduce ambiguity between discarding SYCL and PI events #12547
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rename the variable for discarding PI events and reword its comment to make the distinction clearer.
sergey-semenov
temporarily deployed
to
WindowsCILock
GitHub Actions
Inactive
sergey-semenov
temporarily deployed
to
WindowsCILock
GitHub Actions
Inactive
cperkinsintel
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The old variable name for support of discarding PI events (MHasDiscardEventsSupport) made it easy to confuse with discarding SYCL events (MDiscardEvents), especially since we could have a situation where MHasDiscardEventsSupport is false, but MDiscardEvents is true.
Rename the variable for discarding PI events and reword its comment to make the distinction clearer.