Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SYCL][ESIMD] Report an error when slm_init is called more than once in the kernel #12804
[SYCL][ESIMD] Report an error when slm_init is called more than once in the kernel #12804
Changes from 13 commits
fb018e5
10fceb8
95febd7
26c5eaf
be39333
a0f13d1
5edbbd5
1fa24a1
4685bab
3bbc5b2
836c1ed
8853912
955f44a
909bf52
a909ff2
36e8273
795a085
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we send an email to the CFE/SYCL language team as a non-blocking follow-up to see if they have any ideas on improving this check by doing it somewhere else (Sema?). Relying on the metadata should work but it seems a bit indirect and possibly flaky, but I don't know how to do any better today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will do, although it looks like a standard way to mark passing accessors to the kernel from FE
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: the comment is not precise. It tests the case when a function is marked
noinline
, notnot marked as always_inline
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed