Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow advertisement or entries chain truncation #132

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gammazero
Copy link
Collaborator

When traversing an advertisement chain or entries chain, handle a NotFound error as an indication that the chain was intentionally truncated, and ingest the portion of the chain that was found.

When traversing an advertisement chain or entries chain, handle a NotFound error as an indication that the chain was intentionally truncated, and ingest the portion of the chain that was found.
// found. Consider this to mean the chain was truncated at this point,
// and return what was found so far.
if errors.Is(err, ipld.ErrNotExists{}) {
log.Warnw("stopping ipld traversal due to content not found")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it would be great to record these and be able to occasionally re-try?
it's easy to imagine mis-configured provider web servers that could get into states where a 404 is returned when the data is only temporarily unavailable.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, this is certainly a desirable.
I imagine the bulk of the complexity in facilitating this is the semantics of retry: persisting the state of retriable CIDs while not blocking the ad ingestion. That would need to have some upper limit per provider per retry.

But first, a quick sanity check: @gammazero do we surface this error to providers at /providers endpoint?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is still an error if the first CID asked for is not found. It is only considered intentional if, at some point in chain traversal, a NotFound is returned. So, if a web server is misconfigured, then the first requested CID should result in error. So, I think it is safe to assume that a NotFound, if it occurs at a later point in traversal, is intentional.

@gammazero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related to this PR: ipni/specs#25

@gammazero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Changing this to draft until there is a decision on ipni/specs#25

@gammazero gammazero marked this pull request as draft October 12, 2023 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants