forked from programmable-web-project-unioulu/PWP
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
analysis and reflection
Iván Sánchez edited this page Jan 20, 2020
·
25 revisions
📑 Chapter summary
In this section we would like that you reflect about the work you have done during the course.- Reflect about own learning
- Feedback on course instruction
✔️ Chapter evaluation (max 7.5 points)
You can get a maximum of 4.5 points after completing the Analysis and Reflection section. In addition you can get up to 3.0 points due to correct Project management. More detailed evaluation is provided after each heading.📑 Content that must be included in the section
Explain how you would improve your RESTful API and your client application. Try to develop the ideas, and explain why each improvement is needed✔️ Evaluation criteria(max 1.5 points)
- Future work is provided and carefully thought out: 1.5
✏️ Write here your text
📑 Content that must be included in the section
Discuss in this section the things that you would have done differently if you started the project after this course ends.✔️ Evaluation criteria(max 1.0 points)
- A short reflective description of what was learned while working on the project 1.0
✏️ Write here your text
📑 Content that must be included in the section
Comment where you encountered the main difficulties while doing your project work. Discuss about the easiest/most difficult parts of the project. Provide convincing statements.✔️ Evaluation criteria(max 1.0 points)
- A short reflective description of the easiest/most difficults parts of the projects 1.0
✏️ Write here your text
📑 Content that must be included in the section
Make sincere comments about the course. How this course could be improved? What should be changed? What should not be changed?✔️ Evaluation criteria(max 1.0 points)
- Useful course feedback - what we should change, what we should keep: 1.0
✏️ Write here your text
📑 Project management
This section should not contain anything. Just be sure that meeting notes and resource allocation are up to date✔️ Evaluation criteria(max 5.0 points)
- Resource allocation was filled for all deadlines: 0.5
- Good meeting notes were taken during each meeting 1.5
- Good time management during the whole course 1.0
- Attendace to all meetings and active participation in those 2.0(1.0 if you missed one meeting or not enough active, 0 otherwise.
✏️ You do not need to write anything here. Just be sure that your meeting notes and resource allocation are up to date
📑 Exercises
This section should not contain anything. Just be sure that you have completed the exercises in Lovelace✔️ Evaluation criteria(max 16.0 points)
- Correct implementation of all exercises tasks and attendance to the exercise session (for those taking the 6 deliverables option) 16.0
✏️ You do not need to write anything here. Just be sure that you have delivered all the exercises in
| Task | Student | Estimated time |
|---|---|---|