Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infer a valid influence graph instead of erasing it. #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

daemontus
Copy link
Collaborator

This should resolve #102.

Copy link

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
balm
   control.py1141488%102, 114, 120, 124, 129, 138–154, 472, 475, 488
   interaction_graph_utils.py48590%6–8, 46, 164–165
   motif_avoidant.py152299%25, 121
   petri_net_translation.py1481193%18–22, 58, 94, 207–208, 232–233, 242, 346
   space_utils.py129497%25–27, 252, 278
   succession_diagram.py2471295%6, 163, 177, 185, 188, 205–206, 312, 439, 627, 665, 700
   symbolic_utils.py26388%10–12, 44
   trappist_core.py1833084%11–15, 45, 47, 82, 129, 195, 197, 199, 227–230, 234–236, 256–262, 320, 322, 352, 392, 394, 425, 454
balm/_sd_algorithms
   compute_attractor_seeds.py30197%8
   expand_attractor_seeds.py51590%6, 42, 97–102
   expand_bfs.py28196%6
   expand_dfs.py30197%6
   expand_minimal_spaces.py37295%6, 31
   expand_source_SCCs.py164696%19–21, 91, 101, 143, 287
   expand_to_target.py31390%6, 38, 43
TOTAL146310093% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
363 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 37.861s ⏱️

@daemontus daemontus merged commit 0db59e4 into main Feb 29, 2024
8 checks passed
@daemontus daemontus deleted the fix-102 branch February 29, 2024 22:13
jcrozum added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
@jcrozum jcrozum mentioned this pull request Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AEON FVS parity option seems to have no effect
1 participant