perfect as a process of giving

content/en/learn/module-7/giving.mdx

@@ -119,14 +119,16 @@ Scarcity.
 
 </Flash>
 
-While we feel that some of his work may come across to many as idealistic, we think he poses a genuinely fascinating [question](/learn/module-2/better-questions/): **can we co-create sacred economic environments**?
+While we feel that some of his work may come across to many as idealistic, we think Charles Eisenstein poses a genuinely fascinating question: 
+
+> 💡 **Can we co-create sacred economic environments**?
 
 The sacred is that which is bigger than 'me' and simultaneously something in which one can 
 participate, of which one is intimately a part. The sacred simply gives meaning to our lives; 
 nothing more, nothing less. This is why the most potent gifts - sacrifices - are always at the 
 heart of sacred ritual and initiatory rite.
 
-> 💡 **What does it mean to imagine a web of smart contracts as ceremonial transactional space?**
+> 💡 **What if we imagined smart contracts as ceremonial transactional space?**
 
 <Video src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/317296843?color=ffffff&byline=0" />
 

content/en/learn/module-7/perfection.mdx

@@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ featuredImage: images/shares/learn.png
 # 🙊 Perfecting Language
 
 <Aligner center sx={{fontStyle: 'italic'}}>
+<Box>
 Nor grieve, dear heart,<br/> 
 nor fear the seeming.<br/> 
 Here is waking in the dreaming.<br/> 
 <br/>
-– [Abraham Merritt](http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0602001h.html) (adapted)
+– <Link to="http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0602001h.html">Abraham Merritt</Link> (adapted)
+</Box>
 </Aligner> 
 
 Is it possible to guard effectively against the inertia of language? Arguably, we cannot