-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added test to verify package modules are accessible as symbols #422
Conversation
Please make sure CI passes before requesting reviews. Unless you need help with something. Thank you ❤️ |
@spbnick Have a look now? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice start, Abhishek. I have a few questions inline, but the main thing is that this is not recursive and only checks two levels. You can make this recursive, if you define a function inside the test, which accepts a package, checks its contents, and calls itself on each package inside the supplied package. Then you can call this function (let's call it check_package
for this example) from the test function like this: check_package(kcidb)
.
Also, it's strange that this doesn't fail for any of the packages you managed to check here 🤔 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @octonawish-akcodes! This is pretty good already. I left you a couple requests inline.
Otherwise, have you tested this? E.g. by removing a symbol for a submodule, or adding a (dummy) submodule without adding the symbol?
test_kcidb.py
Outdated
module_fullname = f"{package.__name__}.{module_name}" | ||
module = importlib.import_module(module_fullname) | ||
assert hasattr(package, module_name) | ||
assert isinstance(getattr(package, module_name), type(module)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you check that the actual symbol is the module? E.g. like this:
assert getattr(package, module_name, None) is module
This would replace both of your assertions.
It would help if you added a comprehensive message for the assertion failure something along the lines of "Package X is missing the symbol for submodule Y".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried everything but its passing on every stage sir
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you figure out why, and what the solution should be? This test would be useless otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek22512@gmail.com>
This PR added a test to verify package modules are accessible as symbols in the kcidb directory.
This PR closes #404
@spbnick need reviews