Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Шмаков Данил #223

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
116 changes: 97 additions & 19 deletions cs/HomeExercises/NumberValidatorTests.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,32 +1,110 @@
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
using FluentAssertions;
using NUnit.Framework;

namespace HomeExercises
{
[TestFixture]
public class NumberValidatorTests
{
[Test]
public void Test()
public static TestCaseData[] unsignedPositiveNumberTestCases =
{
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => new NumberValidator(-1, 2, true));
Assert.DoesNotThrow(() => new NumberValidator(1, 0, true));
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => new NumberValidator(-1, 2, false));
Assert.DoesNotThrow(() => new NumberValidator(1, 0, true));

Assert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.0"));
Assert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0"));
Assert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.0"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("00.00"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("-0.00"));
Assert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.0"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("+0.00"));
Assert.IsTrue(new NumberValidator(4, 2, true).IsValidNumber("+1.23"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("+1.23"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(17, 2, true).IsValidNumber("0.000"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("-1.23"));
Assert.IsFalse(new NumberValidator(3, 2, true).IsValidNumber("a.sd"));
new TestCaseData(1, 0, "0").SetName("When_UnsignedZero"),
new TestCaseData(2, 1, "0.0").SetName("When_UnsignedZero_WithOneDigitAfter"),
new TestCaseData(1, 0, "1").SetName("When_UnsignedOneDigitNumber"),
new TestCaseData(2, 0, "12").SetName("When_UnsignedTwoDigitNumber"),
new TestCaseData(2, 1, "1.2").SetName("When_UnsignedTwoDigitNumber_WithOneDigitAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(3, 2, "1.23").SetName("When_UnsignedThreeDigitNumber_WithTwoDigitsAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(3, 1, "12.3").SetName("When_UnsignedThreeDigitNumber_WithOneDigitAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(4, 2, "12.34").SetName("When_UnsignedFourDigitNumber_WithTwoDigitsAfterPoint"),
};

public static TestCaseData[] signedPositiveNumberTestCases =
{
new TestCaseData(2, 0, "+0").SetName("When_PositiveZero"),
new TestCaseData(3, 1, "+0.0").SetName("When_PositiveZero_WithOneDigitAfter"),
new TestCaseData(2, 0, "+1").SetName("When_PositiveOneDigitNumber"),
new TestCaseData(3, 0, "+12").SetName("When_PositiveTwoDigitNumber"),
new TestCaseData(3, 1, "+1.2").SetName("When_PositiveTwoDigitNumber_WithOneDigitAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(4, 2, "+1.23").SetName("When_PositiveThreeDigitNumber_WithTwoDigitsAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(4, 1, "+12.3").SetName("When_PositiveThreeDigitNumber_WithOneDigitAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(5, 2, "+12.34").SetName("When_PositiveFourDigitNumber_WithTwoDigitsAfterPoint"),
};

public static TestCaseData[] negativeNumberTestCases =
{
new TestCaseData(2, 0, "-0").SetName("When_NegativeZero"),
new TestCaseData(3, 1, "-0.0").SetName("When_NegativeZero_WithOneDigitAfter"),
new TestCaseData(2, 0, "-1").SetName("When_NegativeOneDigitNumber"),
new TestCaseData(3, 0, "-12").SetName("When_NegativeTwoDigitNumber"),
new TestCaseData(3, 1, "-1.2").SetName("When_NegativeTwoDigitNumber_WithOneDigitAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(4, 2, "-1.23").SetName("When_NegativeThreeDigitNumber_WithTwoDigitsAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(4, 1, "-12.3").SetName("When_NegativeThreeDigitNumber_WithOneDigitAfterPoint"),
new TestCaseData(5, 2, "-12.34").SetName("When_NegativeFourDigitNumber_WithTwoDigitsAfterPoint"),
};

public static TestCaseData[] wrongCases =
{
new TestCaseData(1, 0, "-1")
.SetName("When_NegativeIntegerNumber_HavePrecisionLesserOrEqual_ThanDigitsCount").Returns(false),
new TestCaseData(1, 0, "+1")
.SetName("When_PositiveIntegerNumber_HavePrecisionLesserOrEqual_ThanDigitsCount").Returns(false),
new TestCaseData(2, 1, "+1.2")
.SetName("When_PositiveNumberWithFractionalPart_HavePrecisionLesserOrEqual_ThanDigitsCount")
.Returns(false),
new TestCaseData(2, 1, "-1.2")
.SetName("When_NegativeNumberWithFractionalPart_HavePrecisionLesserOrEqual_ThanDigitsCount")
.Returns(false),
};

[TestCaseSource(nameof(unsignedPositiveNumberTestCases))]
[TestCaseSource(nameof(signedPositiveNumberTestCases))]
[TestCaseSource(nameof(negativeNumberTestCases))]
public void IsValidNumber(int precision, int scale, string validatingString)
{
new NumberValidator(precision, scale)
.IsValidNumber(validatingString)
.Should()
.BeTrue();
}

[TestCaseSource(nameof(wrongCases))]
public bool IsNotValidNumber(int precision, int scale, string validatingString)
{
return new NumberValidator(precision, scale).IsValidNumber(validatingString);
}

[TestCaseSource(nameof(negativeNumberTestCases))]
public void IsFailWithOnlyPositiveFlag(int precision, int scale, string validatingString)
{
new NumberValidator(precision, scale, true)
.IsValidNumber(validatingString)
.Should()
.BeFalse();
}

[TestCase(3, 2, "a.sd", TestName = "WhenContain_NonDigitSymbols")]
[TestCase(2, 1, ".0", TestName = "WhenHaveNot_DigitBeforePoint")]
[TestCase(1, 0, "0.", TestName = "WhenHaveNot_DigitAfterPointIfExist")]
public void IsWrongFormat(int precision, int scale, string validatingString, bool onlyPositive = true)
{
new NumberValidator(precision, scale, onlyPositive)
.IsValidNumber(validatingString)
.Should()
.BeFalse();
}

[TestCase(-1, 1, TestName = "When_NegativePrecision")]
[TestCase(1, -1, TestName = "When_NegativeScale")]
[TestCase(-1, -1, TestName = "When_NegativePrecisionAndScale")]
[TestCase(1, 1, TestName = "When_PrecisionEqualsScale")]
[TestCase(1, 2, TestName = "When_PrecisionLessThanScale")]
public void ShouldThrow(int precision, int scale, bool onlyPositive = true)
{
Assert.Throws<ArgumentException>(() => new NumberValidator(precision, scale, onlyPositive));
}
}

Expand Down
28 changes: 18 additions & 10 deletions cs/HomeExercises/ObjectComparison.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
using FluentAssertions;
using System;
using FluentAssertions;
using FluentAssertions.Equivalency;
using NUnit.Framework;

namespace HomeExercises
Expand All @@ -16,15 +18,13 @@ public void CheckCurrentTsar()
new Person("Vasili III of Russia", 28, 170, 60, null));

// Перепишите код на использование Fluent Assertions.
Assert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Name, expectedTsar.Name);
Assert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Age, expectedTsar.Age);
Assert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Height, expectedTsar.Height);
Assert.AreEqual(actualTsar.Weight, expectedTsar.Weight);

Assert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent!.Name, actualTsar.Parent!.Name);
Assert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent.Age, actualTsar.Parent.Age);
Assert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent.Height, actualTsar.Parent.Height);
Assert.AreEqual(expectedTsar.Parent.Parent, actualTsar.Parent.Parent);
actualTsar.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expectedTsar, options =>
options
.IgnoringCyclicReferences()
.Excluding((IMemberInfo info) =>
info.SelectedMemberInfo.DeclaringType == typeof(Person)
&& info.SelectedMemberInfo.Name == nameof(Person.Id))
);
}

[Test]
Expand All @@ -35,7 +35,15 @@ public void CheckCurrentTsar_WithCustomEquality()
var expectedTsar = new Person("Ivan IV The Terrible", 54, 170, 70,
new Person("Vasili III of Russia", 28, 170, 60, null));


// Какие недостатки у такого подхода?

// 1. Вероятность StackOverflow из-за бесконечной рекурсии
// 2. При каждом изменении свойств или добавлении новых функцию придётся переписывать
// 3. Нарушение SRP, ответственность за сравнение объетов должна быть инкапсулирована в класс
// 4. Тест не показывает, по каким критериям различаются два объекта
// 5. Название теста не говорит о конкрутных различиях этого теста с предыдущим

Assert.True(AreEqual(actualTsar, expectedTsar));

This comment was marked as outdated.

}

Expand Down