Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[rebased #3360] cluster: drop DisableLocalStorageCapacityIsolation #3651

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

Rebased #3360, original description below:

it was used to workaround a kubelet crash issue with rootless providers.

The Kubelet seems to work fine now with localStorageCapacityIsolation enabled in a user namespace so drop the special handling. After this change, ephemeral storage can be used in a rootless cluster.

Closes: #3359

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 10, 2024
@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Jun 11, 2024

all fedora jobs failed?

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

There was a flake SSH-ing to the VM in each of them, doesn't seem related.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

BenTheElder commented Jun 11, 2024

it never even ran kind in this flake https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kind/actions/runs/9457245522/job/26088691929#step:7:22

failed during rootless setup

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

I'd like all the CI to pass here ideally before merge.

I don't think the issue is with these changes though so we should probably debug elsewhere.

#648 will run these without changes

it was used to workaround a kubelet crash issue with rootless
providers.

The Kubelet seems to work fine now with localStorageCapacityIsolation
enabled in a user namespace so drop the special handling.  After this
change, ephemeral storage can be used in a rootless cluster.

Closes: kubernetes-sigs#3359

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased again after #3653

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

All tests passing now.

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor

aojea commented Jun 11, 2024

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5f89286 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 11, 2024
29 checks passed
@BenTheElder BenTheElder deleted the pr3360 branch June 11, 2024 21:20
@BenTheElder BenTheElder added this to the v0.24.0 milestone Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ephemeral storage not available when using (docker/podman) rootless providers
4 participants