-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: cluster-wizard UI & oidc-scopes #3209
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a5509d2
fix: improved margin of oidc switch
chriskari ea9e708
fix: display multiple scopes in cluster review
chriskari 4049dd7
fix: improved css of first wizard step
chriskari 259877e
fix: display multiple scopes in cluster review
chriskari 62d57c2
fix: wizard and dialog size
chriskari ab14770
fix: further css adjustments
chriskari 2440f39
fix: further css adjustments
chriskari 5126b78
fix: further css adjustments
chriskari bb9b93a
fix: form ui adjustments
chriskari b16ccde
fix: list input instead of formfield for scopes
chriskari 629b564
test: adjust unit test to previous changes
chriskari a0c6004
fix: openid scope always present
chriskari 41abccf
fix: openid scope always present
chriskari File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a specific reason why you don't want to go this way?
https://github.com/kyma-project/busola/pull/3289/files
Busola is trying to mimic the behavior of the
kubelogin
command, which does not requireopenid
to be passed as--oidc-extra-scope
. Imho you should implement it the same way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Christian, thanks for your review and contribution.
Yes you are correct, I was unaware of your PR, next time you could attach it to the issue to make it more apparent :D
I have a follow-up question to you: should all the defined
--oidc-extra-scope
be passed along with the openid scope in thescope
argument of theUserManager
constructor?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
meaning if you have defined
--oidc-extra-scope=scope_a
,--oidc-extra-scope=scope_b
should the scope passed to the oidc UserManager bescope: "openid scope_a scope_b"
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I thought it would be enough to link the fix to the issue. Next time I'll put it right at the beginning of the issue description. Regarding your question: you're right, the scopes have to be passed like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks, I will incorporate your changes in my PR 👍