Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "wfe: on rate limit error, serve 500 (#7796)" #7900

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jsha
Copy link
Contributor

@jsha jsha commented Dec 18, 2024

This reverts commit 242d746 (#7796)

We want to make this change, but it carries some risk that we'd prefer not to take over the holiday. We'd also like to keep main in a state where it would be reasonable to deploy (even if, in practice, any over-the-holiday deploy would be a hotfix, not a direct tag from main).

This reverts commit 242d746.

We want to make this change, but it carries some risk that we'd prefer not to
take over the holiday. We'd also like to keep `main` in a state where it would
be reasonable to deploy (even if, in practice, any over-the-holiday deploy would
be a hotfix, not a direct tag from `main`).
@jsha jsha requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2024 18:58
@jsha jsha requested a review from aarongable December 18, 2024 18:58
aarongable
aarongable previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2024
@aarongable aarongable requested review from a team and beautifulentropy and removed request for a team December 18, 2024 19:44
@aarongable
Copy link
Contributor

I think merging a revert on one review is acceptable, but I've requested review from the rest of dev anyway.

@jsha jsha dismissed stale reviews from beautifulentropy and aarongable via 8a293fc December 20, 2024 18:18
@jsha
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsha commented Dec 20, 2024

Pushed to fix merge conflicts.

@jsha jsha merged commit d6e163c into main Dec 20, 2024
12 checks passed
@jsha jsha deleted the revert-ratelimit-500 branch December 20, 2024 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants