-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add vcomlink test #1016
Add vcomlink test #1016
Conversation
If this test depends on the EVE PR and would fail until it is merged and released, then this PR should wait. |
Yeah, I get it. But it is a conundrum, how I can show that my PR in eve works fine without merging this test, and on the other hand merging this breaks the eden tests. |
8d0c3d5
to
06b9eac
Compare
e27c64d
to
9962754
Compare
This is ready to be merge as soon as we get the new eve release. |
f71d237
to
1fd58e3
Compare
5cd1830
to
c10614b
Compare
c10614b
to
6ece39c
Compare
@shjala so EVE 13.3.0 supports the test? |
6ece39c
to
d31a004
Compare
yes, it runs green locally, lets see what happens here. |
655570b
to
b5dc108
Compare
This is really frustrating, it runs fine locally (running smoke test) but here fails to wait for the app to be ready, I increased the timer to 30m but still... |
We need to think if there's something in Eden or problem in runners... |
Inside attached artifacts (in console logs) I can see BTW it would be nice to show timestanps and errors if any in state transition in test logs (from |
I see the eden default DefaultEVEH is KVM and in the app config NoHyper is set to false, and
Good point, I will add it. |
I see |
e0efa23
to
06d3107
Compare
Signed-off-by: Shahriyar Jalayeri <shahriyar@zededa.com>
AppWaitForRunningState : now reports each state changes AppWaitForSSH : repoprts wating EveRebootAndWait : reports waiting AppSCPCopy : check if local file exists since it is not checked by scp plus adjusted some sleep times. Signed-off-by: Shahriyar Jalayeri <shahriyar@zededa.com>
This is a test for EVE PR #4142. Signed-off-by: Shahriyar Jalayeri <shahriyar@zededa.com>
@giggsoff Thanks for your help. It is now passing as part of virtualization tests:
@milan-zededa @uncleDecart some other tests are failing but I'm not touching any part relevant to those, general flakiness? anyways this PR is ready. |
We will retry them just in case. At least one of them is a known failure. |
@milan-zededa @uncleDecart should we merge this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM from my side, if @milan-zededa is okay with patch I'd merge it
This is a test for lf-edge/eve#4142, but I don't know which one should go first ?!
Reduce the test verbosity before merging