-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Patch Envelopes: Flatten ZInfoPatchEnvelopeUsage and remove opaque status #33
Conversation
proto/info/patch_envelope.proto
Outdated
uint64 patchApiCallCount = 3; | ||
// count the number of times app instance actually downloaded | ||
// whole patch envelope or part of it | ||
uint64 timesDownload = 4; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apart from breaking changes, yetus suggests to change this to snake case. I didn't know that we are using snake case in proto messages
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we are using snake case in new protobuf (unless it is new values in an existing enum when we follow the existing convention for that enum).
The protoc produces the same output i.e., lowerCamelCase even as you change the proto file to use lower_snake_case.
proto/info/patch_envelope.proto
Outdated
uint64 patchApiCallCount = 3; | ||
// count the number of times app instance actually downloaded | ||
// whole patch envelope or part of it | ||
uint64 timesDownload = 4; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both of them have the semantics of "counter", but the naming convention does not tell that at all - "times" vs. "count". Can we make the names indicate that both are counters?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed to snake_case with count in name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some items to fix, See separate comments.
eacb548
to
cfb064e
Compare
…tatus There is no need for additional structure since there is 1 to 1 releation. This commit also removes opaque status since it is duplication of AppInstMetaData Signed-off-by: Pavel Abramov <uncle.decart@gmail.com>
…atchEnvelopeUsage Signed-off-by: Pavel Abramov <uncle.decart@gmail.com>
cfb064e
to
4b8d611
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Before submitting PR with Patch Envelopes status I'm opening one for EVE API to flatten
ZInfoPatchEnvelopeUsage
and remove Opaque Status since it's duplication of AppInstMetadataSince this slightly changes API @gkodali-zededa @udit-zededa please review and comment :)