Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Api capability ntp fqdn #77

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

christoph-zededa
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@christoph-zededa christoph-zededa force-pushed the api_capability_ntp_fqdn branch 2 times, most recently from fb0244f to d017158 Compare December 2, 2024 09:52
@christoph-zededa christoph-zededa marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 09:52
@@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ enum APICapability {
API_CAPABILITY_MTU = 8; // Allows to set MTU for network adapters and network instances
API_CAPABILITY_ADAPTER_USER_LABELS = 9; // Supports user-defined shared network adapter labels
API_CAPABILITY_ENFORCED_NET_INTERFACE_ORDER = 10; // EVE is able to enforce the user-defined order of application network interfaces
API_CAPABILITY_NTP_FQDN = 11; // Allow to set NTP server via FQDN instead of only IP
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this capability also include using multiple NTP servers? If so please add that to the comment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, makes sense to include it. I changed the comment.

Add a capability to notify the controller that the NTP server cannot
only by an IP address but also a domain name

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
@eriknordmark eriknordmark merged commit 1a8f9be into lf-edge:main Dec 13, 2024
4 checks passed
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
christoph-zededa added a commit to christoph-zededa/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
eriknordmark pushed a commit to lf-edge/eve that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Need to bump eve-api after following PR
lf-edge/eve-api#77

Signed-off-by: Christoph Ostarek <christoph@zededa.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants