Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allow passing options to memoryAddrBook #3062

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

2color
Copy link
Contributor

@2color 2color commented Nov 25, 2024

Background

I'm adding an instance of the MemoryAddrBook to someguy to manage peer record caching/ttls locally in a similar fashion to libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub#555.

That requires passing passing options and using it without a PeerStore. For that being able to pass options is handy.

This PR also fixes the defaults in the factory.

@2color 2color requested a review from sukunrt November 25, 2024 10:44
@2color 2color changed the title chore: make MemoryAddrBook public feat: allow passing options to memoryAddrBook public Nov 25, 2024
@2color 2color changed the title feat: allow passing options to memoryAddrBook public feat: allow passing options to memoryAddrBook Nov 25, 2024
@sukunrt
Copy link
Member

sukunrt commented Nov 25, 2024

Can't you just use it like libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub#555 does? By assuming the return value is an AddrBook. Otherwise, I'd rather change everything here to use the AddrBook interface and not export MemoryAddrBook.

@2color
Copy link
Contributor Author

2color commented Nov 25, 2024

Can't you just use it like libp2p/go-libp2p-pubsub#555 does? By assuming the return value is an AddrBook. Otherwise, I'd rather change everything here to use the AddrBook interface and not export MemoryAddrBook.

I did. If you look at the latest version of this PR, it solely adds the ability pass in options without using the PeerBook.

@2color 2color merged commit 666d1ed into master Nov 25, 2024
11 checks passed
@2color 2color deleted the addr-book-public branch November 25, 2024 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants