[controller][grpc] Add ClusterAdminOpsGrpcService with handler and tests #4052
sushantmaneVeniceCI-StaticAnalysisAndUnitTests.yml
on: pull_request
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
7s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
18 errors and 21 warnings
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2615)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResubscribeAfterRoleChange:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
activeActiveStoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions();
Wanted 4 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
But was 3 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1579)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1579)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1579)
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2615)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResubscribeAfterRoleChange:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
activeActiveStoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions();
Wanted 4 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.resubscribeForAllPartitions(StoreIngestionTask.java:639)
But was 3 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1579)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1579)
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1579)
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 33 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
1.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.011522d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.135483d,
1737182167924L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.077165d,
1737182167925L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.005551d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003797d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.048841d,
1737182167938L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003907d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.check
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 27 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
10.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.0053d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001864d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.083285d,
1737182161088L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.049692d,
1737182161089L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002375d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.035185d,
1737182161100L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002054d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.Store
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L123
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1000.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 33 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
1.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.011522d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.135483d,
1737182167924L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.077165d,
1737182167925L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.005551d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003797d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.048841d,
1737182167938L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003907d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.check
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 27 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
10.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.0053d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.001864d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.083285d,
1737182161088L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.049692d,
1737182161089L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2607)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002375d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.035185d,
1737182161100L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1293)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1298)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1986)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002054d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1626)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.Store
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L123
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1000.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2615)
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2615)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4314)
However, there were exactly 28 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:635)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:649)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:596)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4147)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1648)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4147)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1926449110
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1650)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1566)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1926449110
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1651)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737182155366},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1926449110
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1940)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737182155366}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2185)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1,
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L123
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1000.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2615)
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2615)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4314)
However, there were exactly 28 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:635)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:649)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:596)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4147)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1648)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4147)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1926449110
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1650)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1566)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1926449110
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1651)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737182155366},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1926449110
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1940)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, attempts=1, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1737182155366}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2185)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5f1943f815_ab3badd5_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1,
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L123
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1000.0] but found [0.0]
|
|
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Integrations / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
|
663 KB |
|
|
clients-jdk11
|
2.66 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk17
|
2.67 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk8
|
2.61 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk11
|
1.54 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk17
|
1.54 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk8
|
1.53 MB |
|
|
integrations-jdk11
|
611 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk17
|
619 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk8
|
599 KB |
|
|
internal-jdk11
|
3.54 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk17
|
3.55 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk8
|
3.52 MB |
|
|
router-jdk11
|
1.07 MB |
|
|
router-jdk17
|
1.05 MB |
|
|
router-jdk8
|
1.05 MB |
|
|
server-jdk11
|
9.47 MB |
|
|
server-jdk17
|
9.14 MB |
|
|
server-jdk8
|
9.32 MB |
|