You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current state of the recoded heuristic (without k-clustifier and reduction rules) does not produce valid solutions for input graphs, which were created via the log-ratio scoring function.
Here is the critical output for samples sizes from 100 to 600 (50 has no errors, but the costs are zero, which is odd, too):
100: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :824.02 while it should be 824.02
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
200: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :3889.59 while it should be 3893.62
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
300: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :9034.73 while it should be 9034.73
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
400: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :13538 while it should be 13552.3
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
500: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :19216.7 while it should be 19229.4
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
CONFLICT TRIPLE FOUND!!!
600: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :26625.3 while it should be 26690.1
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
CONFLICT TRIPLE FOUND!!!
The algorithm was run with the following parameters: -v 3 -r 000000 -c -H
The ILP takes forever, even on the 100-sample, so I could not compare with it.
Here are the results for the old lemon implementation. There seem to be no errors, even though the checker says so:
100: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :817.71 while it should be 817.71
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
200: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :3821.19 while it should be 3821.19
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
300: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :8655.1 while it should be 8655.1
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
400: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :13746 while it should be 13746
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
500: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :18772.2 while it should be 18772.2
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
600: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :24973.4 while it should be 24973.4
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current state of the recoded heuristic (without k-clustifier and reduction rules) does not produce valid solutions for input graphs, which were created via the log-ratio scoring function.
Here is the critical output for samples sizes from 100 to 600 (50 has no errors, but the costs are zero, which is odd, too):
100: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :824.02 while it should be 824.02
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
200: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :3889.59 while it should be 3893.62
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
300: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :9034.73 while it should be 9034.73
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
400: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :13538 while it should be 13552.3
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
500: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :19216.7 while it should be 19229.4
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
CONFLICT TRIPLE FOUND!!!
600: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :26625.3 while it should be 26690.1
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
CONFLICT TRIPLE FOUND!!!
The algorithm was run with the following parameters: -v 3 -r 000000 -c -H
The ILP takes forever, even on the 100-sample, so I could not compare with it.
Here are the results for the old lemon implementation. There seem to be no errors, even though the checker says so:
100: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :817.71 while it should be 817.71
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
200: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :3821.19 while it should be 3821.19
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
300: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :8655.1 while it should be 8655.1
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
400: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :13746 while it should be 13746
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
500: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :18772.2 while it should be 18772.2
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
600: Could not verify the editing costs ... found :24973.4 while it should be 24973.4
Verifying that solution 0 is a valid solution for WCE ...
Solution validity verified!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: