Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build!: move @lukso/lsp-smart-contracts as its own package #894

Closed
wants to merge 48 commits into from

Conversation

CJ42
Copy link
Member

@CJ42 CJ42 commented Feb 28, 2024

What does this PR introduce?

PR Checklist

  • Wrote Tests
  • Wrote & Generated Documentation (readme/natspec/dodoc)
  • Ran npm run lint && npm run lint:solidity (solhint)
  • Ran npm run format (prettier)
  • Ran npm run build
  • Ran npm run test

CJ42 and others added 30 commits February 15, 2024 14:46
@b00ste b00ste force-pushed the package/lukso-lsp-smart-contracts branch from 971bf80 to 5378c3a Compare February 28, 2024 18:37
@CJ42 CJ42 force-pushed the package/lukso-lsp-smart-contracts branch 3 times, most recently from 4df8747 to bd4806c Compare February 29, 2024 00:01
@CJ42 CJ42 force-pushed the package/lukso-lsp-smart-contracts branch from bd4806c to 25ba134 Compare February 29, 2024 00:03
@CJ42 CJ42 force-pushed the package/lukso-lsp-smart-contracts branch from d967134 to 207b816 Compare February 29, 2024 00:40
@CJ42 CJ42 marked this pull request as ready for review February 29, 2024 00:48
Copy link
Member

@skimaharvey skimaharvey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Base automatically changed from build/upgrade-dependencies to lsp-monorepo February 29, 2024 18:27
@CJ42 CJ42 force-pushed the package/lukso-lsp-smart-contracts branch from d3fc765 to 1a00ad2 Compare February 29, 2024 20:53
@CJ42
Copy link
Member Author

CJ42 commented Mar 1, 2024

Closed in favour of #896

@CJ42 CJ42 closed this Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants