Merge pull request #1051 from makerdao/MIP102c2-SP24-amendment-PR

MIP102c2-SP24 amendment PR

MIP113/MIP113.md

@@ -228,47 +228,88 @@ The DAO Toolkit should contain a section showing all active AVCs and their membe
 
 The Atlas Immutable Alignment Artifact is the foundation of the Maker Governance process, and aims to guarantee a long term decentralized governance equilibrium. Atlas Interpretation is used to disambiguate elements in the Atlas with expanded definitions, in connection with specific decisions or disputes relying on language from the Atlas. To make the Atlas as solid and immutable as possible, all Atlas Interpretation is recorded to set a precedent about the spirit of the Atlas and how future interpretations should be made.
 
-### 2.1: Principles of Atlas Interpretation
+### 2.1 Principles of Atlas Interpretation
 
 Atlas Interpretation should only be employed when the Scope Artifacts themselves do not offer enough clarity. The resolution of Scope Artifact ambiguity or disputes must be fully congruent with the spirit of the Atlas and prior precedent, while also clearly setting new precedent and help to prevent future ambiguous situations from occurring. Depending on the level of ambiguity, an MKR vote may be needed to establish the precedent.
 
-### 2.2: Atlas Interpretation Process
+### 2.2 Atlas Interpretation Process
 
 This section contains the processes for proposing and settling Atlas Interpretations.
 
 #### 2.2.1
 
-Atlas interpretation precedent approved through MKR vote is contained as Strengthening subelements of this clause. A majority of Governance Facilitators can trigger a vote to add a new subelement if it is necessary to resolve Atlas ambiguity.
+Any Maker Governance participant can request an Atlas Interpretation from the Governance Facilitators by submiting a post on the Maker Forum. ​​​​​​​In order for the Governance Facilitators to be bound to comply with the interpretation request, it must be endorsed or supported by at least one AVC Member or Aligned Delegate. In all cases the Facilitator can voluntarily proceed with the interpretation.​​​​​​​
 
 #### 2.2.2
 
-Atlas Interpretation precedent made directly by the Governance Facilitators is contained in *2.2.2.1A*.
+When a binding request for an Atlas Interpretation is submitted to the Maker Forum, Governance Facilitators have up to 30 days for review and provide the intepretation.The Governance Facilitators may extend this deadline, if necessary, by 15 days, provided that they have published the justification in the Maker Forum.
 
-##### 2.2.2.1A
+#### 2.2.3
+
+Following the conclusion of the review period, the Governance Facilitators are required to publicly post their response to the Atlas Interpretation request on the Maker Forum. This response must include a detailed rationale for the decision reached, reflecting a comprehensive review of the request. The post must also transparently indicate the voting results among the Facilitators, listing which Facilitators were in favor of or against the decision. This process is designed to ensure accountability and transparency in the decision-making process.
+
+##### 2.2.3.1
+
+In instances where Aligned Delegates or AVC Members proffer specific interpretation proposals subsequent to an original request for interpretation, the Governance Facilitators are obligated to consider these proposals earnestly. The final resolution posted by the Governance Facilitators must include explicit reasoning detailing why each of these additional interpretation proposals was either accepted or dismissed. This justification is crucial to maintain a transparent and inclusive decision-making process, providing insights into the rationale and ensuring that all proposals are given due consideration.
+
+#### 2.2.4
+
+If the Governance Facilitators cannot reach a majority decision regarding an Atlas Interpretation, a vote shall be triggered involving Maker Governance in the final decision.
+
+#### 2.2.5
+
+A majority of Governance Facilitators can trigger a vote to add a new subelement if it is necessary to resolve Atlas ambiguity. Atlas interpretation precedent approved through MKR vote is contained as Strengthening subelements of this clause.
+
+#### 2.2.6
+
+Atlas Interpretation precedent made directly by the Governance Facilitators is contained in 2.2.6.1A.
+
+##### 2.2.6.1A
 
 ¤¤¤
 
-List of direct Atlas Interpretations:
+List of Atlas Interpretations:
+
 1. Payments denominated in NewGovToken in the Atlas or the Scopes will be made in MKR prior to the launch of NewGovToken at the proscribed conversion rate listed in The Atlas.
 
 ¤¤¤
 
+#### 2.2.7
+
+Backtracking mechanism:any Maker Governance participant may request a re-evaluation of an adopted Atlas Interpretation on the Maker Forum, outlining the identified adverse effects and proposed amendments.
+
+#### 2.2.8
+
+The Governance Facilitators will review the request, engage the community, and post the final decision on maintaining, amending, or revoking the interpretation, along with the rationale and any required action plan, in a maximum of 30-days period of the request.
+
 ## 3: Scope Bounded Mutable Alignment Artifact (Scope Artifact)
 
-### 3.1: Scope Artifact Appeals
+### 3.1 Scope Artifact Appeals
 
 Scope Artifact appeals are a process that allows any Maker Governance participant to trigger a review of a Scope Artifact. This can be in connection with the Scope Artifact failing to follow the Atlas Boundaries, or if it contains biased or otherwise conflicted elements. It can either be a general misalignment of the language of the Scope Artifact, or a specific situation where the Scope Artifact is being misinterpreted or otherwise violated.
 
-#### 3.1.1: Scope Artifact Appeals Process
+#### 3.1.1 Scope Artifact Appeals Process
 
 Scope Artifact appeal proposals are submitted by AVC Members, and can be accepted or rejected by a majority of the Governance Facilitators. If a Scope Artifact appeal is accepted, the Governance Facilitators must review it. Governance Facilitators can also directly choose to review a Scope Artifact for adherence with Scope boundaries and Atlas alignment.
 
 ##### 3.1.1.1
 
-The Governance Facilitators can by consensus directly edit a Scope Artifact to align its content with the Scope boundaries and other Atlas requirements such as neutrality.
+When a request for an Scope Artifact Appeal is submitted to the Maker Forum, Governance Facilitators have up to 30 days for review and provide the answer.The Governance Facilitators may extend this deadline, if necessary, by 15 days, provided that they have published the justification in the Maker Forum.
 
 ##### 3.1.1.2
 
+Following the conclusion of the review period, the Governance Facilitators are required to publicly post their response to the Atlas Appeal request on the Maker Forum. This response must include a detailed rationale for the decision reached, reflecting a comprehensive review of the request. The post must also transparently indicate the voting results among the Facilitators, listing which Facilitators were in favor of or against the decision. This process is designed to ensure accountability and transparency in the decision-making process.
+
+##### 3.1.1.3
+
+If the Governance Facilitators cannot reach a majority decision regarding an Atlas Appeal Request, a vote shall be triggered involving Maker Governance in the final decision.
+
+##### 3.1.1.4
+
+The Governance Facilitators can by consensus directly edit a Scope Artifact to align its content with the Scope boundaries and other Atlas requirements such as neutrality.
+
+##### 3.1.1.5
+
 A majority of the Responsible Facilitators can trigger an MKR governance poll to implement an edit to the appealed Scope Artifact that will align it with the Scope boundaries and other Atlas requirements such as neutrality.
 
 ## 4: Alignment Conservers