Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #1124 from makerdao/Bootstrapping-edit-proposal-vo…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…te-to-enable-Endgame-Launch

GOV12.1.2 proposal to enable Endgame Launch
  • Loading branch information
VoteWizard authored Aug 16, 2024
2 parents 0b14eb1 + b17468c commit c07617a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 12 additions and 2 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions MIP104/MIP104.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ The Stability Facilitators must ensure that potential Advisory Council Members c

Advisory Council Members must be Ecosystem Actors that are not involved in any business, political, or other governance-related activity that could result in a conflict of interest, either directly or indirectly. They must also have relevant skills for providing professional expert input on the content that the Stability Scope is covering.

An exception is in effect for BA Labs, while they are the sole core-level Risk Advisor, as it relates to work with Ethena, as this overlap the Maker Ecosystem a higher possibility to have early transparency and opportunity to react in case of any internal issues with Ethena, as well as allowing BA Labs to bring Ethenas risk strategy to standard aligned with Maker. If other Risk Advisors are added, they will need to take over all relevant risk work related to Ethena.

##### 1.1.1.3

The Stability Facilitators must periodically, when it is relevant, review the Advisory Council Applications, and if they find applications that are suitable, bring them to a vote through an MKR governance poll. When Advisory Council Applications are posted on the Maker Forum, which must follow the template as per *1.1.2.4.1A*, the Stability Facilitators have a review period of 30 days. During this review period, the applicant must host a Community Q&A and shall answer as many questions and doubts as possible.
Expand Down
12 changes: 10 additions & 2 deletions MIP108/MIP108.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -233,9 +233,17 @@ The new brand must be launched alongside the launch of the NewStable and NewGovT

###### 2.1.2.3.1

When the new brand and associated website have been fully developed and are ready for launch, the Accessibility Facilitator must directly take all necessary steps to implement the new brand and its related launch marketing campaigns, in a single, coordinated effort. The new products must be launched simultaneously or following the launch of the new brand, in order to maximize market impact and success. All Facilitators must support in triggering whatever type of needed executive vote, or other type of vote, to support the impactful and seamless launch of the Endgame Products and brand.
The Accessibility Facilitator is required to develop the new brand and brand identity with relevant, best-in-class companies and ecosystem actors.

###### 2.1.2.3.1.1: Following the reveal of the new brand, the MIP portal must be prepared for the vote to upgrade the Atlas to the Atlas v2 version, using a weekly governance poll. This must happen after the implementation of the new brand, and will involve the full adoption of the new brand in the Atlas. Until the upgrade to Atlas v2, the existing Atlas will continue to refer to the existing brand, temporarily, while all external facing websites and frontends must refer to the new branding
Prior to the moment of rebrand, The Accessibility Facilitator must share representative rebrand material with Alignment Conservers who must approve or reject it on behalf of the community without spoiling the surprise of the rebrand. The following 2 Governance Facilitators: Jansky, Endgame Edge, if they remain Governance Facilitators when the rebrand is finished, and the following 3 Prime Delegates: Cloaky, Blue and Julia Chang, if they remain Prime Delegates when the rebrand is finished.

The Governance Facilitators and Prime Delegates specified above (that still remain Governance Facilitator or Prime Delegate as specified above) must then post publicly on the Maker Core category on the Maker Forum that they have reviewed and their approval of the quality of the rebrand material.

If 2/3rds majority of the Alignment Conservers (that still remain Governance Facilitator or Prime Delegate as specified above) agree with the rebrand, then the Accessibility Facilitator must proceed with the rebrand and engage with all relevant Ecosystem Actors to execute the rebrand and the update of all relevant websites and frontends to reflect the new brand and maximize the potential for accessibility and educational campaigns in bringing in new users to the ecosystem.

###### 2.1.2.3.1.1

Following the reveal of the new brand, the MIP portal must be prepared for the vote to upgrade the Atlas to the Atlas v2 version, using a weekly governance poll. This must happen after the implementation of the new brand, and will involve the full adoption of the new brand in the Atlas. Until the upgrade to Atlas v2, the existing Atlas will continue to refer to the existing brand, temporarily, while all external facing websites and frontends must refer to the new branding.

##### 2.1.2.4

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c07617a

Please sign in to comment.