You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are using logical pool names created not after runner size, but after purpose. Thus we might have two runner pools with the same machine flavor under two names, as we manage underlying machine size independently for each pool.
Atm, operator disallows cration of such pools if flavor, image and repository are the same (even if name differs).
Error: failed to create resource: admission webhook "validate.pool.garm-operator.mercedes-benz.com"
denied the request: can not create pool, pool=medium with same image=ubuntu-22, flavor=e2-standard-4
and provider=gcp_external already exists for specified GitHubScope=monorepo
We would like ability to lessen that limitation.
Anything else you would like to add?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gustaff-weldon
changed the title
Ability to specify same flavor and image under a different name
Ability to specify same flavor and image under a different pool name
Jun 28, 2024
Hey @gustaff-weldon thanks for raising this issue and for using the operator 🙏
The reason for that limitation is a garm limitation which exists till v0.1.4.
Gabriel removed that limitation in cloudbase/garm#246
I'm not sure yet, if we should extend the operator in that way, that versions <= v0.1.4 are supported or explicitly pin operator versions to certain garm versions.
What is the feature you would like to have?
We are using logical pool names created not after runner size, but after purpose. Thus we might have two runner pools with the same machine flavor under two names, as we manage underlying machine size independently for each pool.
Atm, operator disallows cration of such pools if flavor, image and repository are the same (even if name differs).
We would like ability to lessen that limitation.
Anything else you would like to add?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: