-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No unlock ring #126
No unlock ring #126
Conversation
i3lock-fancy
Outdated
@@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ while true ; do | |||
convert -list font | awk -F: '/Font: / { print $2 }' | sort -du | command -- ${PAGER:-less} | |||
exit 0 ;; | |||
-n|--nofork) i3lock_cmd+=(--nofork) ; shift ;; | |||
-u|--nounlockindicator) i3lock_cmd=(i3lock -i "$image" -u) ; shift ;; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you resetting the command instead of i3lock_cmd+=(-u)
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not? The only differences seem to me to be improved readability, and avoiding repetitive options if some user script ends up passing "-u -u -u -u".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's possible someone can have flags which are then over written, such as:
i3lock-fancy -gp -f Noto-Sans -u
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@meskarune : All the options that you mentioned are handled differently by the script, so nothing would be overwritten. Wait a minute, the no-fork option does conflict, so I do need to make the change.
Looks like there's a conflict with b77540e |
1] At this point, after the delay and intervening commits, why are you surprised? 2] Did you bother to look at b77540e and see how trivial that issue is? 3] Your pettiness is tiring. 4] At this point, our versions have diverged so much that any further offers to contribute here will be difficult to do via pull requests at all; I'll still share via posting issues and referencing code snippets, unless I give up on your personality. At this point, my version of the script does more, fills the requests of users who have asked for new features, and is more computationally efficient. |
You have some issues buddy. Hope you figure them out. |
This addresses upstream (master) issue #120 by @davidv171