Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No unlock ring #126

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Boruch-Baum
Copy link
Contributor

This addresses upstream (master) issue #120 by @davidv171

i3lock-fancy Outdated
@@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ while true ; do
convert -list font | awk -F: '/Font: / { print $2 }' | sort -du | command -- ${PAGER:-less}
exit 0 ;;
-n|--nofork) i3lock_cmd+=(--nofork) ; shift ;;
-u|--nounlockindicator) i3lock_cmd=(i3lock -i "$image" -u) ; shift ;;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are you resetting the command instead of i3lock_cmd+=(-u)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not? The only differences seem to me to be improved readability, and avoiding repetitive options if some user script ends up passing "-u -u -u -u".

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's possible someone can have flags which are then over written, such as:
i3lock-fancy -gp -f Noto-Sans -u

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@meskarune : All the options that you mentioned are handled differently by the script, so nothing would be overwritten. Wait a minute, the no-fork option does conflict, so I do need to make the change.

@AladW
Copy link
Collaborator

AladW commented Aug 8, 2018

Looks like there's a conflict with b77540e

@Boruch-Baum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AladW

1] At this point, after the delay and intervening commits, why are you surprised?

2] Did you bother to look at b77540e and see how trivial that issue is?

3] Your pettiness is tiring.

4] At this point, our versions have diverged so much that any further offers to contribute here will be difficult to do via pull requests at all; I'll still share via posting issues and referencing code snippets, unless I give up on your personality. At this point, my version of the script does more, fills the requests of users who have asked for new features, and is more computationally efficient.

@AladW
Copy link
Collaborator

AladW commented Aug 8, 2018

You have some issues buddy. Hope you figure them out.

@AladW AladW closed this Aug 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants