Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump development version to 0.8.0 #549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2013
Merged

Bump development version to 0.8.0 #549

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2013

Conversation

jey
Copy link
Contributor

@jey jey commented Apr 1, 2013

This patch bumps the version number of the master branch to "0.8.0-SNAPSHOT" so that bugfix releases of the 0.7.x branch can be made, and to comply with the Semantic Versioning convention.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

pwendell commented Apr 1, 2013

Thanks for catching this - I think maybe it was just a typo when Matei
bumped versions to 0.7.1 in the master branch. If you look at the last
major release, we bumped the master version to

0.7.0-SNAPSHOT

Just after we cut 0.6.0

0967e71

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jey Kottalam notifications@github.com wrote:

This patch bumps the version number of the master branch to "0.8.0-SNAPSHOT"
so that bugfix releases of the 0.7.x branch can be made, and to comply with
the Semantic Versioning convention.


You can merge this Pull Request by running

git pull https://github.com/jey/spark bump-development-version-to-0.8.0

Or view, comment on, or merge it at:

#549

Commit Summary

Bump development version to 0.8.0

File Changes

M bagel/pom.xml (2)
M core/pom.xml (2)
M docs/_config.yml (4)
M examples/pom.xml (2)
M pom.xml (2)
M project/SparkBuild.scala (2)
M repl-bin/pom.xml (2)
M repl/pom.xml (2)
M repl/src/main/scala/spark/repl/SparkILoop.scala (2)
M streaming/pom.xml (2)

Patch Links:

https://github.com/mesos/spark/pull/549.patch
https://github.com/mesos/spark/pull/549.diff

@mateiz
Copy link
Member

mateiz commented Apr 1, 2013

As discussed on the mailing list, I don't think we need to do this yet. Eventually we will need to create a branch-0.7 which contains fixes to 0.7.x and change master to 0.8, but right now the fixes in master are also good for 0.7.1.

@markhamstra
Copy link
Contributor

My only problem with your approach, Matei, is with new functionality added to 0.7.1-SNAPSHOT leaking out into an eventual 0.7.1 release before it is fully mature. For example, in catching up with #456, it strikes me that there is enough overlap with the recently merged #510 (mapWith, filterWith, etc.) that I'll likely do a refactoring/combining/extending of these efforts later this week. That's fine as long as there haven't been any severe bugs requiring a 0.7.1 release yet, but we probably should try to segregate new API functionality from purely bugfix changes so that a bugfix release can easily be made without leaking new public API that we may still want to rework.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@massie
Copy link

massie commented Apr 5, 2013

Jenkins, test this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished.

@mateiz mateiz merged commit bc8ba22 into mesos:master Apr 8, 2013
@mateiz
Copy link
Member

mateiz commented Apr 8, 2013

I've merged this in and created a branch-0.7 for further development of 0.7. Thanks Jey!

sarahgerweck pushed a commit to AtScaleInc/spark2 that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2014
…esos#549.

remove actorToWorker in master.scala, which is actually not used

actorToWorker is actually not used in the code....just remove it

Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>

== Merge branch commits ==

commit 52656c2d4bbf9abcd8bef65d454badb9cb14a32c
Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 6 00:28:26 2014 -0500

    remove actorToWorker in master.scala, which is actually not used
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants