Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorder & normalize Changelog #180

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

PragTob
Copy link
Contributor

@PragTob PragTob commented Dec 23, 2023

  • ordered changelog by version number, not sure if there is a general rule but having 1.4.1 inbetween the two 1.5 alpha releases felt weird
  • standardized the format, so that it has "Enhancements" like the previous releases

* ordered changelog by version number, not sure if there is a general rule but having 1.4.1 inbetween the two 1.5 alpha releases felt weird
* standardized the format, so that it has "Enhancements" like the previous releases
@PragTob
Copy link
Contributor Author

PragTob commented Aug 7, 2024

@michalmuskala 👋 Also just noticed that the newest 1.4 release changelog entries aren't on main which is a bit confusing coming in. Any interest in porting these over or the initial change here? :)

Take care! 💚

@michalmuskala
Copy link
Owner

Yeah, it's a bit of a mess currently since main is the code for the, 1.5 branch which I don't think will move forward, and the 1.4 branch has the separate patches, and where the changelog for that branch lives.
TBH I'm not really sure what's the best way forward here

@PragTob
Copy link
Contributor Author

PragTob commented Aug 13, 2024

I personally think that backporting the changelog from branches to main for released versions is good practice, as that's what most people will go to/see and it'd be nice to have one "complete" changelog

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants