-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Repro stashed upload blob issue when processing reuploaded blob #22981
Open
dannimad
wants to merge
5
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
dannimad:tombstoneblobs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+140
−8
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
area: runtime
Runtime related issues
base: main
PRs targeted against main branch
labels
Nov 5, 2024
packages/runtime/container-runtime/src/blobManager/blobManager.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
msfluid-bot
reviewed
Nov 5, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Coverage Summary
↑ packages.runtime.container-runtime.src:
Line Coverage Change: 0.01% Branch Coverage Change: No change
Metric Name | Baseline coverage | PR coverage | Coverage Diff |
---|---|---|---|
Branch Coverage | 92.90% | 92.90% | → No change |
Line Coverage | 94.50% | 94.51% | ↑ 0.01% |
↑ packages.runtime.container-runtime.src.blobManager:
Line Coverage Change: 0.02% Branch Coverage Change: 0.14%
Metric Name | Baseline coverage | PR coverage | Coverage Diff |
---|---|---|---|
Branch Coverage | 96.66% | 96.80% | ↑ 0.14% |
Line Coverage | 99.14% | 99.16% | ↑ 0.02% |
Baseline commit: 75937e1
Baseline build: 304279
Happy Coding!!
Code coverage comparison check passed!!
⯅ @fluid-example/bundle-size-tests: +2.06 KB
Baseline commit: 0b57176 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a test repro of AB#4630.
To reproduce such issue, I had to fake the localId generation using uuidOverride constructor method in the blob manager so we could aim at a unique pending blob: such pending blob was: 1 stashed, 2 reapplied to a different blob manager simulating rehydration, 3 processed and 4 reuploaded by stashing workflow, which ends up in the issue described in the ADO item.
In order to wait for the reupload I had to create a different blob manager method waitForStashedBlobs() since the one we have hasPendingStashedUploads() uses pendingBlobs array as reference, which blob entry would be removed by the processing step.
A fix will follow up this PR.