bump version to 0.9.7

.gitignore

@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ target/
 # cargo fmt backups
 *.bk
 *.txt
-tests/tmpfile-test-cicada-scripts.out
+tmpfile-test-cicada-scripts.out

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Change Logs
 
-## 0.9.7 - master
+## 0.9.7 - 2019-05-26
 
 - Added functions ability into scripting.
 - Fixed alias expansion when using `xargs`: `foo | xargs ls`.

README.md

@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ Read APIs here: [https://docs.rs/cicada/](https://docs.rs/cicada/).
 
 - [Why another shell?](https://github.com/mitnk/cicada/blob/master/docs/faq.md#why-another-shell)
 - [Compare to bash?](https://github.com/mitnk/cicada/blob/master/docs/faq.md#compare-to-bash)
-- [When will functions get supported in cicada?](https://github.com/mitnk/cicada/blob/master/docs/faq.md#when-will-functions-get-supported-in-cicada)
 - [Is cicada POSIX-compatible?](https://github.com/mitnk/cicada/blob/master/docs/faq.md#is-cicada-posix-compatible)
 - [Will my bash/zsh scripts continue work in cicada?](https://github.com/mitnk/cicada/blob/master/docs/faq.md#will-my-bashzsh-scripts-continue-work-in-cicada)
 - [Windows support?](https://github.com/mitnk/cicada/blob/master/docs/faq.md#windows-support)

docs/faq.md

@@ -2,25 +2,28 @@
 
 ### Why another shell?
 
-- for fun
-- to learn Rust
-- have a shell that can customize a bit for my own needs
+- <del>for fun</del>
+- <del>to learn Rust</del>
+- <del>have a shell that can customize a bit for my own needs</del>
+
+Because we can.
 
 ### Compare to bash?
 
 Bash is where most people come from and familiar with. So cicada is trying
 to support common cases that bash supports. Cicada will only be a "subset"
-of bash. Currently cicada does not have scripting/function ability.
+of bash. <del>Currently cicada does not have scripting/function ability.</del>
 
 ### When will functions get supported in cicada?
 
-Maybe someday in future, and it won't be complex as bash scriping for sure.
+<del>Maybe someday in future, and it won't be complex as bash scriping for sure.</del>
+Scripting/functions **have been added** since cicada 0.9.7.
 
 ### Is cicada POSIX-compatible?
 
 As the above answers hints, while cicada is trying to be POSIX, but it will
-not be a fully POSIX shell. However, If any command pattern is common and
-cicada is missing, we can add it.
+not be a fully POSIX shell. However, if any command pattern is common and
+cicada is missing, we could add it.
 
 ### Will my bash/zsh scripts continue work in cicada?
 
@@ -33,4 +36,5 @@ shell scripts/functions in RC files to initiate cicada shell.
 
 ### Windows support?
 
-Cicada is a Unix shell, sorry.
+Cicada is a Unix shell, sorry. There are a lot of alternative cool shells
+for Windows, for example [xonsh](https://xon.sh/).