Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(NODE-5342): modernize explain tests #3720

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

test(NODE-5342): modernize explain tests #3720

merged 26 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

malikj2000
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

explain tests modernized
removed metadata
converted to typescript

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

no

What is the motivation for this change?

new things are nice and look clean

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@malikj2000 malikj2000 marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2023 20:37
@W-A-James W-A-James self-requested a review June 12, 2023 14:16
@W-A-James W-A-James self-assigned this Jun 12, 2023
@W-A-James W-A-James added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Jun 12, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@W-A-James W-A-James left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, great job so far!

test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
W-A-James
W-A-James previously approved these changes Jun 14, 2023
@W-A-James W-A-James added Team Review Needs review from team and removed Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes labels Jun 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@dariakp dariakp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not review the entire set of tests, but I think it would be worthwhile to double check all test cases and make sure that 1) the "it" blocks accurately capture the behavior of interest and 2) the assertions fully test the described behavior. I called out one example of what I mean, let me know if you have any questions.

test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dariakp dariakp added the wip label Jun 16, 2023
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/crud/explain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
W-A-James
W-A-James previously approved these changes Jun 28, 2023
dariakp
dariakp previously approved these changes Jun 28, 2023
@W-A-James W-A-James self-requested a review June 28, 2023 19:19
W-A-James
W-A-James previously approved these changes Jun 28, 2023
@malikj2000 malikj2000 dismissed stale reviews from W-A-James and dariakp via 3ce249b June 28, 2023 19:21
@W-A-James W-A-James dismissed baileympearson’s stale review June 28, 2023 19:47

Concerns addressed in subsequent commits

@W-A-James W-A-James merged commit 0d9007a into main Jun 28, 2023
1 check passed
@W-A-James W-A-James deleted the NODE-5342 branch June 28, 2023 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team Review Needs review from team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants