Fix error condition for contentionFactor option #1437
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jmikola
commented
Jun 22, 2023
| @@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ NOTE: The Range algorithm is experimental only. It is not intended for public us | |||
| contentionFactor | |||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |||
| contentionFactor only applies when algorithm is "Indexed" or "RangePreview". | |||
| It is an error to set contentionFactor when algorithm is not "Indexed". | |||
| It is an error to set contentionFactor when algorithm is not "Indexed" or "RangePreview". | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other options were amended to say "or RangePreview", so I think it was just an oversight that contentionFactor was not. The prose test for range index certainly uses this option.
addaleax
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd consider this a small fix not worthy of a changelog entry but let me know if you disagree.