Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update description of the dt parameter. #288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

plietar
Copy link
Member

@plietar plietar commented Apr 4, 2024

The dt parameter was described as "the delay to move from state Tr to Ph", but the Ph (prophylaxis) state does not exist in the model. Instead the dt parameter is used to transition from Tr to S, in R/processes.R.

Looking at the commit history, there seems to have been a bit of back and forth around adding and removing the Tr and Ph states. The comment in question was introduced in #30, after the prophylaxis state had already been removed and even at the time the parameter was already used as the transition rate from Tr to S.

@plietar plietar requested a review from pwinskill April 4, 2024 09:01
The dt parameter was described as "the delay to move from state Tr to
Ph", but the Ph (prophylaxis) state does not exist in the model. Instead
the dt parameter is used to transition from Tr to S, in `R/processes.R`.

Looking at the commit history, there seems to have been a bit of back
and forth around adding and removing the Tr and Ph states. The comment
in question was introduced in #30, after the
prophylaxis state had already been removed and even at the time the
parameter was already used as the transition rate from Tr to S.
@plietar plietar force-pushed the fix-parameter-comment branch from 4ad2a8b to c395661 Compare April 4, 2024 09:01
Copy link
Member

@pwinskill pwinskill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Paul. Good spot. You're right that this has been an area of the model that has changed in the past.

@plietar plietar merged commit e9d46e7 into dev Apr 25, 2024
4 checks passed
@giovannic giovannic mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants