Home

Welcome to the ideastockexchange wiki!

ReasonRank: Google's PageRank for Arguments

Google's PageRank algorithm can be repurposed to assess the strength of arguments presented in pro/con debates. This method effectively ties the credibility of a final conclusion to its supporting arguments, mirroring how PageRank assigns website importance based on backlinks.

Quantifying Reason: The Power of Truth Scores

Welcome to a revolutionary concept in argument evaluation - the direct integration of the scores for Logical Fallacy and the Evidence Verification. Our approach quantifies the strength of an argument by scrutinizing its logical integrity and empirical validation. The Logical Fallacy Score measures the impact of identified logical fallacies within an argument, while the Evidence Verification Score assesses the degree of independent corroboration, through rigorous methods like blind studies and scenario comparisons. Together, these scores not only elevate the accuracy and rationality of our beliefs but also promise a new era of intellectual discourse. We invite bright minds to join us in coding this vision into reality, unlocking the potential to change how we debate, learn, and grow.

Mapping the Path to Truth: Leveraging Linkage Scores for Evidence and Arguments

We're developing a revolutionary approach to rational discourse and decision-making, using Evidence-to-Conclusion and Argument-to-Conclusion Linkage Scores. Our method gauges the strength of causal relationships between evidence, arguments, and conclusions, determining their relevance and impact. It's grounded in the collective wisdom of pro/con arguments and the consensus on an evidence's relevance, all evaluated through an adaptation of Google's PageRank Algorithm. This project promises a new era in assessing validity and truth, harnessing the power of collective reasoning to clarify the path to better beliefs and decisions. Come join us in building this groundbreaking tool for the future of rational discourse.

The Impact Algorithm: Decoding Argument Importance and Belief Impact Scores.

Argument Importance Score: Measures the degree to which a belief's truth relies on the truth of a particular argument, by comparing the performance of pro and con sub-arguments and determining whether it is the primary deciding factor in the belief's strength. The pro/con arguments are evaluated using Google's PageRank Algorithm.

Belief Impact Score (BIS): Evaluates arguments by assessing their strength in components. It combines the Argument Impact Score and cost-benefit analysis to determine the impact of accepting a belief. The BIS helps identify essential beliefs for society and those with the greatest potential for improving culture. Users gather beliefs and reasons and assess argument strength using linkage scores. A user-friendly template collects necessary information, stored in a database. Scoring algorithms consider costs, benefits, risks, sources of information, consensus level, and other factors. Scores are normalized to add up to 100% and presented using a web interface. The pro/con arguments are evaluated using Google's PageRank Algorithm.