Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cover more priors with empirical distribution extension function #184

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

AaronDJohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

Reopen #180 which was closed on accident.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #184 (ca633f4) into master (b7b90e5) will increase coverage by 1.31%.
The diff coverage is 45.83%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #184      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.06%   38.37%   +1.31%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        3899     4253     +354     
==========================================
+ Hits         1445     1632     +187     
- Misses       2454     2621     +167     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
enterprise_extensions/empirical_distr.py 73.86% <ø> (ø)
enterprise_extensions/sampler.py 38.40% <45.83%> (-0.64%) ⬇️
enterprise_extensions/deterministic.py 11.83% <0.00%> (ø)
enterprise_extensions/models.py 43.79% <0.00%> (+2.58%) ⬆️
enterprise_extensions/blocks.py 47.86% <0.00%> (+3.73%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b7b90e5...ca633f4. Read the comment docs.

@AaronDJohnson AaronDJohnson merged commit 8ad9ff4 into nanograv:master Dec 21, 2022
@AaronDJohnson AaronDJohnson deleted the emp_dists branch December 21, 2022 19:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants