Add ascii tag

[nao1215]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new validation rule for ASCII character checks, enhancing data validation options.
  • Added new error messages for ASCII validation in English, Japanese, and Russian localizations.
  • Implemented an ASCII validator to ensure inputs conform to ASCII standards.

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced error handling for non-ASCII characters in CSV input.

• Documentation

  • Updated documentation to include the new ASCII validation rule.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new validation rule for ASCII characters across multiple files, enhancing error handling and localization. A new error identifier is added, and corresponding messages are included in English, Japanese, and Russian localization files. Additionally, a new ASCII validator struct is implemented, along with a test case to ensure proper validation of ASCII input in CSV files.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
README.md	Added documentation for a new "ascii" validation rule.
csv_test.go	Introduced a test case for validating ASCII characters in CSV input.
errors.go	Added a new error identifier ErrASCIIID for non-ASCII character validation.
i18n/en.yaml	Added a new error message entry ErrASCII for non-ASCII character validation in English.
i18n/ja.yaml	Added a new error message entry ErrASCII for non-ASCII character validation in Japanese.
i18n/ru.yaml	Added a new error message entry ErrASCII for non-ASCII character validation in Russian.
parser.go	Enhanced parseValidateTag function to support ASCII validation tags.
tag.go	Introduced a new constant asciiTagValue for ASCII fields.
validation.go	Added asciiValidator struct to validate ASCII strings, including a constructor and validation method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CSVDecoder
    participant ASCIIValidator
    participant ErrorHandler

    User->>CSVDecoder: Provide CSV input
    CSVDecoder->>ASCIIValidator: Validate input for ASCII
    ASCIIValidator->>ASCIIValidator: Check each character
    ASCIIValidator-->>ErrorHandler: Return error if non-ASCII found
    ErrorHandler-->>CSVDecoder: Provide error message
    CSVDecoder-->>User: Return validation result

Loading

🐰 In a world of code so bright,
ASCII rules bring pure delight.
With messages clear in every tongue,
Validation’s song is now well sung!
Hopping through tests, we cheer and play,
For perfect inputs, hip-hip-hooray! 🎉

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Code Metrics Report

	main (2c7ab54)	#12 (290b345)	+/-
Coverage	81.5%	81.7%	+0.1%
Test Execution Time	8s	11s	+3s

Details

  |                     | main (2c7ab54) | #12 (290b345) |  +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|---------------|-------|
+ | Coverage            |          81.5% |         81.7% | +0.1% |
  |   Files             |              6 |             6 |     0 |
  |   Lines             |            325 |           334 |    +9 |
+ |   Covered           |            265 |           273 |    +8 |
- | Test Execution Time |             8s |           11s |   +3s |

Code coverage of files in pull request scope (83.1% → 83.3%)

Files	Coverage	+/-
errors.go	87.5%	0.0%
parser.go	79.0%	+0.2%
tag.go	100.0%	0.0%
validation.go	85.3%	+0.1%

---

Reported by octocov