Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Finn oppgave selv om saksbehandler har byttet behandlingstype #1258

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Finn oppgave selv om saksbehandler har byttet behandlingstype #1258

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

stigebil
Copy link
Contributor

@stigebil stigebil commented Nov 7, 2023

Samme som: #1246

Oppgaver blir ikke ferdigstilt hvis saksbehandler har byttet behandlingstype i gosys, fordi den ikke finner oppgaver på Tilbakekreving når den er flyttet til EØS.

@stigebil stigebil requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2023 11:12
@@ -203,7 +203,6 @@ class OppgaveService(
fagsak: Fagsak,
): Pair<FinnOppgaveRequest, FinnOppgaveResponseDto> {
val finnOppgaveRequest = FinnOppgaveRequest(
behandlingstype = Behandlingstype.Tilbakekreving,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hvorfor hjelper det å gjøre dette?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Som nevnt i tekst. Det finnes ingen oppgave lenger med behandlingstype Tilbakekreving siden saksbehandler har endret i Gosys, selv om de har fått beskjed om å ikke gjøre det. Ved å fjerne den sjekken så finner man de. Det er kun lov med en åpen oppgave av en oppgavetype per saksreferanse.

Copy link
Contributor

@halvorbmundal halvorbmundal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stigebil stigebil closed this Nov 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants