chore: add logger to debug #30
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update introduces enhanced logging and multiple flags to improve vote validation within the system. It focuses on adding detailed logging for the current year and specific configuration settings, alongside introducing flags that assist in validating votes based on various conditions. These changes aim to streamline the vote validation process, making it more robust and transparent. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- functions/src/v1/firestore/private/user/year/vote/onCreate.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
functions/src/v1/firestore/private/user/year/vote/onCreate.ts (2)
- 48-48: Logging the
CURRENT_YEARvariable is a good practice for debugging purposes, ensuring that the system is operating within the correct temporal context.- 72-72: Logging
configHackathonYearVoteprovides visibility into the configuration settings for the hackathon year vote, which is crucial for debugging and ensuring that votes are processed according to the correct rules and timelines.
| const flag1 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt; | ||
| const flag2 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt | ||
| ? configHackathonYearVote.startAt <= privateUserYearVote.createdAt | ||
| : false; | ||
| const flag3 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt | ||
| ? privateUserYearVote.createdAt <= configHackathonYearVote.endAt | ||
| : false; | ||
| const flag4 = vote.userId; | ||
| const flag5 = vote.yearId === CURRENT_YEAR; | ||
| const flag6 = vote.teamId; | ||
| const flag7 = vote.submissionId; | ||
| const flag8 = Number.isInteger(vote.point); | ||
| const flag9 = vote.point >= 0; | ||
| const flag10 = vote.point <= privateUserYearVote.votes.length * 5; | ||
| const flag11 = totalPoints <= privateUserYearVote.votes.length * 5; | ||
| const flag12 = typeof vote.message === 'string'; | ||
| logger.debug({ | ||
| flag1, | ||
| flag2, | ||
| flag3, | ||
| flag4, | ||
| flag5, | ||
| flag6, | ||
| flag7, | ||
| flag8, | ||
| flag9, | ||
| flag10, | ||
| flag11, | ||
| flag12, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The introduction of multiple flags (flag1 to flag12) for various conditions related to vote validation significantly enhances the debugging capabilities. Logging these flags allows developers to quickly identify which specific conditions a vote does or does not meet. However, consider adding more descriptive names for these flags to improve code readability and maintainability.
- const flag1 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt;
+ const flagCreatedAtExists = privateUserYearVote.createdAt;
- const flag2 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt ? configHackathonYearVote.startAt <= privateUserYearVote.createdAt : false;
+ const flagWithinStartPeriod = privateUserYearVote.createdAt ? configHackathonYearVote.startAt <= privateUserYearVote.createdAt : false;
...Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const flag1 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt; | |
| const flag2 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt | |
| ? configHackathonYearVote.startAt <= privateUserYearVote.createdAt | |
| : false; | |
| const flag3 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt | |
| ? privateUserYearVote.createdAt <= configHackathonYearVote.endAt | |
| : false; | |
| const flag4 = vote.userId; | |
| const flag5 = vote.yearId === CURRENT_YEAR; | |
| const flag6 = vote.teamId; | |
| const flag7 = vote.submissionId; | |
| const flag8 = Number.isInteger(vote.point); | |
| const flag9 = vote.point >= 0; | |
| const flag10 = vote.point <= privateUserYearVote.votes.length * 5; | |
| const flag11 = totalPoints <= privateUserYearVote.votes.length * 5; | |
| const flag12 = typeof vote.message === 'string'; | |
| logger.debug({ | |
| flag1, | |
| flag2, | |
| flag3, | |
| flag4, | |
| flag5, | |
| flag6, | |
| flag7, | |
| flag8, | |
| flag9, | |
| flag10, | |
| flag11, | |
| flag12, | |
| }); | |
| const flagCreatedAtExists = privateUserYearVote.createdAt; | |
| const flagWithinStartPeriod = privateUserYearVote.createdAt | |
| ? configHackathonYearVote.startAt <= privateUserYearVote.createdAt | |
| : false; | |
| const flag3 = privateUserYearVote.createdAt | |
| ? privateUserYearVote.createdAt <= configHackathonYearVote.endAt | |
| : false; | |
| const flag4 = vote.userId; | |
| const flag5 = vote.yearId === CURRENT_YEAR; | |
| const flag6 = vote.teamId; | |
| const flag7 = vote.submissionId; | |
| const flag8 = Number.isInteger(vote.point); | |
| const flag9 = vote.point >= 0; | |
| const flag10 = vote.point <= privateUserYearVote.votes.length * 5; | |
| const flag11 = totalPoints <= privateUserYearVote.votes.length * 5; | |
| const flag12 = typeof vote.message === 'string'; | |
| logger.debug({ | |
| flagCreatedAtExists, | |
| flagWithinStartPeriod, | |
| flag3, | |
| flag4, | |
| flag5, | |
| flag6, | |
| flag7, | |
| flag8, | |
| flag9, | |
| flag10, | |
| flag11, | |
| flag12, | |
| }); |
| flag11, | ||
| flag12, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The validation logic that checks if a vote meets all the necessary conditions is crucial for ensuring the integrity of the voting process. However, this large conditional statement could be refactored into a separate function to improve readability and maintainability. Additionally, consider using more descriptive error messages to aid in debugging.
+ function validateVote(vote, privateUserYearVote, configHackathonYearVote, totalPoints) {
+ // Implement the validation logic here, returning true if the vote is valid, false otherwise.
+ }
...
- if (
- !(
- privateUserYearVote.createdAt &&
- configHackathonYearVote.startAt <= privateUserYearVote.createdAt &&
- ...
- )
- ) {
- throw Error('vote is not valid');
- }
+ if (!validateVote(vote, privateUserYearVote, configHackathonYearVote, totalPoints)) {
+ throw Error('Vote validation failed: [provide specific reason here]');
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| function validateVote(vote, privateUserYearVote, configHackathonYearVote, totalPoints) { | |
| // Implement the validation logic here, returning true if the vote is valid, false otherwise. | |
| } | |
| if (!validateVote(vote, privateUserYearVote, configHackathonYearVote, totalPoints)) { | |
| throw Error('Vote validation failed: [provide specific reason here]'); | |
| } |
The repeated error message 'teamSaltHexString is not valid' for different checks (teamSaltHexString, teamIvHexString, teamEncryptedPrivateKey, teamPublicKey, teamAddress) could lead to confusion during debugging. Ensure that each error message is unique and descriptive to accurately reflect the specific validation failure.
- throw Error('teamSaltHexString is not valid');
+ throw Error('teamIvHexString is not valid');
...
+ throw Error('teamEncryptedPrivateKey is not valid');
...
+ throw Error('teamPublicKey is not valid');
...
+ throw Error('teamAddress is not valid');Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
Summary by CodeRabbit